From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] xfs: make xattri_leaf_bp more useful
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:58:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220510225822.GG27195@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509004138.762556-4-david@fromorbit.com>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:41:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> We currently set it and hold it when converting from short to leaf
> form, then release it only to immediately look it back up again
> to do the leaf insert.
>
> Do a bit of refactoring to xfs_attr_leaf_try_add() to avoid this
> messy handling of the newly allocated leaf buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Took me a while to figure this out, but looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index b3d918195160..a4b0b20a3bab 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,15 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_addname(
> int error;
>
> if (xfs_attr_is_leaf(dp)) {
> +
> + /*
> + * Use the leaf buffer we may already hold locked as a result of
> + * a sf-to-leaf conversion. The held buffer is no longer valid
> + * after this call, regardless of the result.
> + */
> error = xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(args, attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
> + attr->xattri_leaf_bp = NULL;
> +
> if (error == -ENOSPC) {
> error = xfs_attr3_leaf_to_node(args);
> if (error)
> @@ -341,6 +349,8 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_addname(
> }
> next_state = XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK;
> } else {
> + ASSERT(!attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
> +
> error = xfs_attr_node_addname_find_attr(attr);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -396,12 +406,6 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
> */
> if (xfs_attr_is_shortform(dp))
> return xfs_attr_sf_addname(attr);
> - if (attr->xattri_leaf_bp != NULL) {
> - xfs_trans_bhold_release(args->trans,
> - attr->xattri_leaf_bp);
> - attr->xattri_leaf_bp = NULL;
> - }
> -
> return xfs_attr_leaf_addname(attr);
>
> case XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK:
> @@ -992,18 +996,31 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(
> struct xfs_da_args *args,
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> - int retval;
> + int error;
>
> /*
> - * Look up the given attribute in the leaf block. Figure out if
> - * the given flags produce an error or call for an atomic rename.
> + * If the caller provided a buffer to us, it is locked and held in
> + * the transaction because it just did a shortform to leaf conversion.
> + * Hence we don't need to read it again. Otherwise read in the leaf
> + * buffer.
> */
> - retval = xfs_attr_leaf_hasname(args, &bp);
> - if (retval != -ENOATTR && retval != -EEXIST)
> - return retval;
> - if (retval == -ENOATTR && (args->attr_flags & XATTR_REPLACE))
> + if (bp) {
> + xfs_trans_bhold_release(args->trans, bp);
> + } else {
> + error = xfs_attr3_leaf_read(args->trans, args->dp, 0, &bp);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Look up the xattr name to set the insertion point for the new xattr.
> + */
> + error = xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int(bp, args);
> + if (error != -ENOATTR && error != -EEXIST)
> goto out_brelse;
> - if (retval == -EEXIST) {
> + if (error == -ENOATTR && (args->attr_flags & XATTR_REPLACE))
> + goto out_brelse;
> + if (error == -EEXIST) {
> if (args->attr_flags & XATTR_CREATE)
> goto out_brelse;
>
> @@ -1023,14 +1040,11 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(
> args->rmtvaluelen = 0;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Add the attribute to the leaf block
> - */
> return xfs_attr3_leaf_add(bp, args);
>
> out_brelse:
> xfs_trans_brelse(args->trans, bp);
> - return retval;
> + return error;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.35.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 0:41 [PATCH 00/18 V4] XFS: LARP state machine and recovery rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 01/18] xfs: avoid empty xattr transaction when attrs are inline Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 02/18] xfs: initialise attrd item to zero Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 03/18] xfs: make xattri_leaf_bp more useful Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:58 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 04/18] xfs: rework deferred attribute operation setup Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 05/18] xfs: separate out initial attr_set states Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 1:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:38 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-12 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 06/18] xfs: kill XFS_DAC_LEAF_ADDNAME_INIT Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 07/18] xfs: consolidate leaf/node states in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:09 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 08/18] xfs: split remote attr setting out from replace path Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: XFS_DAS_LEAF_REPLACE state only needed if !LARP Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 10/18] xfs: remote xattr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter() is conditional Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 11/18] xfs: clean up final attr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 12/18] xfs: xfs_attr_set_iter() does not need to return EAGAIN Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 13/18] xfs: introduce attr remove initial states into xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 14/18] xfs: switch attr remove to xfs_attri_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 15/18] xfs: remove xfs_attri_remove_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 16/18] xfs: use XFS_DA_OP flags in deferred attr ops Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 16/18 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:49 ` Alli
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 17/18] xfs: ATTR_REPLACE algorithm with LARP enabled needs rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31 ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 18/18] xfs: detect empty attr leaf blocks in xfs_attr3_leaf_verify Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31 ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 1:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 0:54 ` Alli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220510225822.GG27195@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox