Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] xfs: consolidate leaf/node states in xfs_attr_set_iter
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:20:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220510232019.GK27195@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509004138.762556-8-david@fromorbit.com>

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:41:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> The operations performed from XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK through to
> XFS_DAS_RM_LBLK are now identical to XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK through to
> XFS_DAS_RM_NBLK. We can collapse these down into a single set of
> code.
> 
> To do this, define the states that leaf and node run through as
> separate sets of sequential states. Then as we move to the next
> state, we can use increments rather than specific state assignments
> to move through the states. This means the state progression is set
> by the initial state that enters the series and we don't need to
> duplicate the code anymore.
> 
> At the exit point of the series we need to select the correct leaf
> or node state, but that can also be done by state increment rather
> than assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 127 ++++++---------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h |   9 ++-
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index ab8a884af512..be580da62f08 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  	struct xfs_mount		*mp = args->dp->i_mount;
>  
>  	/* State machine switch */
> +next_state:
>  	switch (attr->xattri_dela_state) {
>  	case XFS_DAS_UNINIT:
>  		ASSERT(0);
> @@ -406,6 +407,7 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  		return xfs_attr_node_addname(attr);
>  
>  	case XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK:
> +	case XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK:
>  		/*
>  		 * Find space for remote blocks and fall into the allocation
>  		 * state.
> @@ -415,9 +417,10 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  			if (error)
>  				return error;
>  		}
> -		attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_LEAF_ALLOC_RMT;
> +		attr->xattri_dela_state++;
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case XFS_DAS_LEAF_ALLOC_RMT:
> +	case XFS_DAS_NODE_ALLOC_RMT:
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * If there was an out-of-line value, allocate the blocks we
> @@ -466,16 +469,18 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  				return error;
>  			/*
>  			 * Commit the flag value change and start the next trans
> -			 * in series.
> +			 * in series at FLIP_FLAG.
>  			 */
> -			attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_FLIP_LFLAG;
> +			attr->xattri_dela_state++;
>  			trace_xfs_attr_set_iter_return(attr->xattri_dela_state,
>  						       args->dp);
>  			return -EAGAIN;
>  		}
>  
> +		attr->xattri_dela_state++;
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case XFS_DAS_FLIP_LFLAG:
> +	case XFS_DAS_FLIP_NFLAG:
>  		/*
>  		 * Dismantle the "old" attribute/value pair by removing a
>  		 * "remote" value (if it exists).
> @@ -485,10 +490,10 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  		if (error)
>  			return error;
>  
> +		attr->xattri_dela_state++;
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case XFS_DAS_RM_LBLK:
> -		/* Set state in case xfs_attr_rmtval_remove returns -EAGAIN */
> -		attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_RM_LBLK;
> +	case XFS_DAS_RM_NBLK:
>  		if (args->rmtblkno) {
>  			error = xfs_attr_rmtval_remove(attr);
>  			if (error == -EAGAIN)
> @@ -503,7 +508,16 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  			return -EAGAIN;
>  		}
>  
> -		fallthrough;
> +		/*
> +		 * This is the end of the shared leaf/node sequence. We need
> +		 * to continue at the next state in the sequence, but we can't
> +		 * easily just fall through. So we increment to the next state
> +		 * and then jump back to switch statement to evaluate the next
> +		 * state correctly.
> +		 */
> +		attr->xattri_dela_state++;
> +		goto next_state;
> +
>  	case XFS_DAS_RD_LEAF:
>  		/*
>  		 * This is the last step for leaf format. Read the block with
> @@ -524,106 +538,6 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  
>  		return error;
>  
> -	case XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK:
> -		/*
> -		 * Find space for remote blocks and fall into the allocation
> -		 * state.
> -		 */
> -		if (args->rmtblkno > 0) {
> -			error = xfs_attr_rmtval_find_space(attr);
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
> -		}
> -
> -		attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_NODE_ALLOC_RMT;
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case XFS_DAS_NODE_ALLOC_RMT:
> -		/*
> -		 * If there was an out-of-line value, allocate the blocks we
> -		 * identified for its storage and copy the value.  This is done
> -		 * after we create the attribute so that we don't overflow the
> -		 * maximum size of a transaction and/or hit a deadlock.
> -		 */
> -		if (args->rmtblkno > 0) {
> -			if (attr->xattri_blkcnt > 0) {
> -				error = xfs_attr_rmtval_set_blk(attr);
> -				if (error)
> -					return error;
> -				trace_xfs_attr_set_iter_return(
> -					attr->xattri_dela_state, args->dp);
> -				return -EAGAIN;
> -			}
> -
> -			error = xfs_attr_rmtval_set_value(args);
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * If this was not a rename, clear the incomplete flag and we're
> -		 * done.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_RENAME)) {
> -			if (args->rmtblkno > 0)
> -				error = xfs_attr3_leaf_clearflag(args);
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * If this is an atomic rename operation, we must "flip" the
> -		 * incomplete flags on the "new" and "old" attribute/value pairs
> -		 * so that one disappears and one appears atomically.  Then we
> -		 * must remove the "old" attribute/value pair.
> -		 *
> -		 * In a separate transaction, set the incomplete flag on the
> -		 * "old" attr and clear the incomplete flag on the "new" attr.
> -		 */
> -		if (!xfs_has_larp(mp)) {
> -			error = xfs_attr3_leaf_flipflags(args);
> -			if (error)
> -				goto out;
> -			/*
> -			 * Commit the flag value change and start the next trans
> -			 * in series
> -			 */
> -			attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_FLIP_NFLAG;
> -			trace_xfs_attr_set_iter_return(attr->xattri_dela_state,
> -						       args->dp);
> -			return -EAGAIN;
> -		}
> -
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case XFS_DAS_FLIP_NFLAG:
> -		/*
> -		 * Dismantle the "old" attribute/value pair by removing a
> -		 * "remote" value (if it exists).
> -		 */
> -		xfs_attr_restore_rmt_blk(args);
> -
> -		error = xfs_attr_rmtval_invalidate(args);
> -		if (error)
> -			return error;
> -
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case XFS_DAS_RM_NBLK:
> -		/* Set state in case xfs_attr_rmtval_remove returns -EAGAIN */
> -		attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_RM_NBLK;
> -		if (args->rmtblkno) {
> -			error = xfs_attr_rmtval_remove(attr);
> -			if (error == -EAGAIN)
> -				trace_xfs_attr_set_iter_return(
> -					attr->xattri_dela_state, args->dp);
> -
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
> -
> -			attr->xattri_dela_state = XFS_DAS_CLR_FLAG;
> -			trace_xfs_attr_set_iter_return(attr->xattri_dela_state,
> -						       args->dp);
> -			return -EAGAIN;
> -		}
> -
> -		fallthrough;
>  	case XFS_DAS_CLR_FLAG:
>  		/*
>  		 * The last state for node format. Look up the old attr and
> @@ -635,7 +549,6 @@ xfs_attr_set_iter(
>  		ASSERT(0);
>  		break;
>  	}
> -out:
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h
> index d016af4dbf81..37db61649217 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h
> @@ -450,16 +450,21 @@ enum xfs_delattr_state {
>  	XFS_DAS_RMTBLK,			/* Removing remote blks */
>  	XFS_DAS_RM_NAME,		/* Remove attr name */
>  	XFS_DAS_RM_SHRINK,		/* We are shrinking the tree */
> +
> +	/* Leaf state set sequence */

I think this comment should note that the state increment operations of
xfs_attr_set_iter requires that the exact order of the values
FOUND_[LN]BLK through RM_[LN]BLK must be preserved exactly.

Question: Are we supposed to be able to dela_state++ our way from
RM_LBLK to RD_LEAF and from RM_NBLK to CLR_FLAG?

With that comment added,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

>  	XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK,		/* We found leaf blk for attr */
>  	XFS_DAS_LEAF_ALLOC_RMT,		/* We are allocating remote blocks */
> -	XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK,		/* We found node blk for attr */
> -	XFS_DAS_NODE_ALLOC_RMT,		/* We are allocating remote blocks */
>  	XFS_DAS_FLIP_LFLAG,		/* Flipped leaf INCOMPLETE attr flag */
>  	XFS_DAS_RM_LBLK,		/* A rename is removing leaf blocks */
>  	XFS_DAS_RD_LEAF,		/* Read in the new leaf */
> +
> +	/* Node state set sequence, must match leaf state above */
> +	XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK,		/* We found node blk for attr */
> +	XFS_DAS_NODE_ALLOC_RMT,		/* We are allocating remote blocks */
>  	XFS_DAS_FLIP_NFLAG,		/* Flipped node INCOMPLETE attr flag */
>  	XFS_DAS_RM_NBLK,		/* A rename is removing node blocks */
>  	XFS_DAS_CLR_FLAG,		/* Clear incomplete flag */
> +
>  	XFS_DAS_DONE,			/* finished operation */
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09  0:41 [PATCH 00/18 V4] XFS: LARP state machine and recovery rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 01/18] xfs: avoid empty xattr transaction when attrs are inline Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 02/18] xfs: initialise attrd item to zero Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 03/18] xfs: make xattri_leaf_bp more useful Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 04/18] xfs: rework deferred attribute operation setup Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:57     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 05/18] xfs: separate out initial attr_set states Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:06     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11  1:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:38         ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11  8:35           ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 15:39             ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-12  0:57               ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 06/18] xfs: kill XFS_DAC_LEAF_ADDNAME_INIT Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 07/18] xfs: consolidate leaf/node states in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:20   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-05-11  1:09     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 08/18] xfs: split remote attr setting out from replace path Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: XFS_DAS_LEAF_REPLACE state only needed if !LARP Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 10/18] xfs: remote xattr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter() is conditional Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 11/18] xfs: clean up final attr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 12/18] xfs: xfs_attr_set_iter() does not need to return EAGAIN Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 13/18] xfs: introduce attr remove initial states into xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 14/18] xfs: switch attr remove to xfs_attri_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 15/18] xfs: remove xfs_attri_remove_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 16/18] xfs: use XFS_DA_OP flags in deferred attr ops Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:20   ` [PATCH 16/18 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:49     ` Alli
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 17/18] xfs: ATTR_REPLACE algorithm with LARP enabled needs rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31   ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:14     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 18/18] xfs: detect empty attr leaf blocks in xfs_attr3_leaf_verify Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31   ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:54     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11  1:10       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:54   ` Alli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220510232019.GK27195@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox