public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 10:54:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511005420.GX1098723@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220510235931.GX27195@magnolia>

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:59:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 08:27:16AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Because when running fsmark workloads with 64kB xattrs, heap
> > allocation of >64kB buffers for the attr item name/value buffer
> > will fail and deadlock.
.....
> > @@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ xfs_attri_item_format(
> >  			sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_format));
> >  	xlog_copy_iovec(lv, &vecp, XLOG_REG_TYPE_ATTR_NAME,
> >  			attrip->attri_name,
> > -			xlog_calc_iovec_len(attrip->attri_name_len));
> > +			attrip->attri_name_len);
> 
> Are we fixing these because the xlog_{copy,finish}_iovec functions do
> the rounding themselves now?

Yes, I forgot that I cleaned this up here when I noticed it.
Probably should mention it in the commit log:

"We also clean up the attribute name and value lengths as they no
longer need to be rounded out to sizes compatible with log vectors."

> 
> >  	if (attrip->attri_value_len > 0)
> >  		xlog_copy_iovec(lv, &vecp, XLOG_REG_TYPE_ATTR_VALUE,
> >  				attrip->attri_value,
> > -				xlog_calc_iovec_len(attrip->attri_value_len));
> > +				attrip->attri_value_len);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -163,26 +163,21 @@ xfs_attri_init(
> >  
> >  {
> >  	struct xfs_attri_log_item	*attrip;
> > -	uint32_t			name_vec_len = 0;
> > -	uint32_t			value_vec_len = 0;
> > -	uint32_t			buffer_size;
> > -
> > -	if (name_len)
> > -		name_vec_len = xlog_calc_iovec_len(name_len);
> > -	if (value_len)
> > -		value_vec_len = xlog_calc_iovec_len(value_len);
> 
> ...and we don't need to bloat up the internal structures anymore either,
> right?

Yup, because we only copy out the exact length of the name/val now.

> 
> > -
> > -	buffer_size = name_vec_len + value_vec_len;
> > +	uint32_t			buffer_size = name_len + value_len;
> >  
> >  	if (buffer_size) {
> > -		attrip = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > -				    buffer_size, KM_NOFS);
> > -		if (attrip == NULL)
> > -			return NULL;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * This could be over 64kB in length, so we have to use
> > +		 * kvmalloc() for this. But kvmalloc() utterly sucks, so we
> > +		 * use own version.
> > +		 */
> > +		attrip = xlog_kvmalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > +					buffer_size);
> >  	} else {
> > -		attrip = kmem_cache_zalloc(xfs_attri_cache,
> > -					  GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > +		attrip = kmem_cache_alloc(xfs_attri_cache,
> > +					GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> >  	}
> > +	memset(attrip, 0, sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item));
> 
> I wonder if this memset should be right after the xlog_kvmalloc and
> leave the kmem_cache_zalloc alone?

Then we memset the header twice in the common small attr case, and
the xfs_attri_log_item header is not exactly what you'd call small
(224 bytes).

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09  0:41 [PATCH 00/18 V4] XFS: LARP state machine and recovery rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 01/18] xfs: avoid empty xattr transaction when attrs are inline Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 02/18] xfs: initialise attrd item to zero Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 03/18] xfs: make xattri_leaf_bp more useful Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 04/18] xfs: rework deferred attribute operation setup Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:57     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 05/18] xfs: separate out initial attr_set states Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:06     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11  1:08       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:38         ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11  8:35           ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 15:39             ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-12  0:57               ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 06/18] xfs: kill XFS_DAC_LEAF_ADDNAME_INIT Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 07/18] xfs: consolidate leaf/node states in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:09     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 08/18] xfs: split remote attr setting out from replace path Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: XFS_DAS_LEAF_REPLACE state only needed if !LARP Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 10/18] xfs: remote xattr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter() is conditional Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 11/18] xfs: clean up final attr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 12/18] xfs: xfs_attr_set_iter() does not need to return EAGAIN Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 13/18] xfs: introduce attr remove initial states into xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 14/18] xfs: switch attr remove to xfs_attri_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 15/18] xfs: remove xfs_attri_remove_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 16/18] xfs: use XFS_DA_OP flags in deferred attr ops Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:20   ` [PATCH 16/18 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:49     ` Alli
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 17/18] xfs: ATTR_REPLACE algorithm with LARP enabled needs rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31   ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  1:14     ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 18/18] xfs: detect empty attr leaf blocks in xfs_attr3_leaf_verify Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31   ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:54     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-05-11  1:10       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11  0:54   ` Alli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511005420.GX1098723@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox