From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 18:10:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511011016.GC27195@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511005420.GX1098723@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:54:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:59:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 08:27:16AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Because when running fsmark workloads with 64kB xattrs, heap
> > > allocation of >64kB buffers for the attr item name/value buffer
> > > will fail and deadlock.
> .....
> > > @@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ xfs_attri_item_format(
> > > sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_format));
> > > xlog_copy_iovec(lv, &vecp, XLOG_REG_TYPE_ATTR_NAME,
> > > attrip->attri_name,
> > > - xlog_calc_iovec_len(attrip->attri_name_len));
> > > + attrip->attri_name_len);
> >
> > Are we fixing these because the xlog_{copy,finish}_iovec functions do
> > the rounding themselves now?
>
> Yes, I forgot that I cleaned this up here when I noticed it.
> Probably should mention it in the commit log:
>
> "We also clean up the attribute name and value lengths as they no
> longer need to be rounded out to sizes compatible with log vectors."
Ok.
> >
> > > if (attrip->attri_value_len > 0)
> > > xlog_copy_iovec(lv, &vecp, XLOG_REG_TYPE_ATTR_VALUE,
> > > attrip->attri_value,
> > > - xlog_calc_iovec_len(attrip->attri_value_len));
> > > + attrip->attri_value_len);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -163,26 +163,21 @@ xfs_attri_init(
> > >
> > > {
> > > struct xfs_attri_log_item *attrip;
> > > - uint32_t name_vec_len = 0;
> > > - uint32_t value_vec_len = 0;
> > > - uint32_t buffer_size;
> > > -
> > > - if (name_len)
> > > - name_vec_len = xlog_calc_iovec_len(name_len);
> > > - if (value_len)
> > > - value_vec_len = xlog_calc_iovec_len(value_len);
> >
> > ...and we don't need to bloat up the internal structures anymore either,
> > right?
>
> Yup, because we only copy out the exact length of the name/val now.
<nod>
> >
> > > -
> > > - buffer_size = name_vec_len + value_vec_len;
> > > + uint32_t buffer_size = name_len + value_len;
> > >
> > > if (buffer_size) {
> > > - attrip = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > > - buffer_size, KM_NOFS);
> > > - if (attrip == NULL)
> > > - return NULL;
> > > + /*
> > > + * This could be over 64kB in length, so we have to use
> > > + * kvmalloc() for this. But kvmalloc() utterly sucks, so we
> > > + * use own version.
> > > + */
> > > + attrip = xlog_kvmalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item) +
> > > + buffer_size);
> > > } else {
> > > - attrip = kmem_cache_zalloc(xfs_attri_cache,
> > > - GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > > + attrip = kmem_cache_alloc(xfs_attri_cache,
> > > + GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > > }
> > > + memset(attrip, 0, sizeof(struct xfs_attri_log_item));
> >
> > I wonder if this memset should be right after the xlog_kvmalloc and
> > leave the kmem_cache_zalloc alone?
>
> Then we memset the header twice in the common small attr case, and
> the xfs_attri_log_item header is not exactly what you'd call small
> (224 bytes).
Eh, ok, NBD.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 0:41 [PATCH 00/18 V4] XFS: LARP state machine and recovery rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 01/18] xfs: avoid empty xattr transaction when attrs are inline Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 02/18] xfs: initialise attrd item to zero Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 03/18] xfs: make xattri_leaf_bp more useful Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 04/18] xfs: rework deferred attribute operation setup Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 05/18] xfs: separate out initial attr_set states Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 1:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:38 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 8:35 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-12 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 06/18] xfs: kill XFS_DAC_LEAF_ADDNAME_INIT Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 07/18] xfs: consolidate leaf/node states in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:09 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 08/18] xfs: split remote attr setting out from replace path Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: XFS_DAS_LEAF_REPLACE state only needed if !LARP Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 10/18] xfs: remote xattr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter() is conditional Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 11/18] xfs: clean up final attr removal in xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 12/18] xfs: xfs_attr_set_iter() does not need to return EAGAIN Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 13/18] xfs: introduce attr remove initial states into xfs_attr_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 14/18] xfs: switch attr remove to xfs_attri_set_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 15/18] xfs: remove xfs_attri_remove_iter Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 16/18] xfs: use XFS_DA_OP flags in deferred attr ops Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 16/18 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 23:49 ` Alli
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 17/18] xfs: ATTR_REPLACE algorithm with LARP enabled needs rework Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31 ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:41 ` [PATCH 18/18] xfs: detect empty attr leaf blocks in xfs_attr3_leaf_verify Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 22:31 ` Alli
2022-05-10 23:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 19/18] xfs: can't use kmem_zalloc() for attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2022-05-10 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-11 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-11 1:10 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-05-11 0:54 ` Alli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220511011016.GC27195@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox