From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: assert in xfs_btree_del_cursor should take into account error
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:21:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524022158.1849458-4-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524022158.1849458-1-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
xfs/538 on a 1kB block filesystem failed with this assert:
XFS: Assertion failed: cur->bc_btnum != XFS_BTNUM_BMAP || cur->bc_ino.allocated == 0 || xfs_is_shutdown(cur->bc_mp), file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 448
The problem was that an allocation failed unexpectedly in
xfs_bmbt_alloc_block() after roughly 150,000 minlen allocation error
injections, resulting in an EFSCORRUPTED error being returned to
xfs_bmapi_write(). The error occurred on extent-to-btree format
conversion allocating the new root block:
RIP: 0010:xfs_bmbt_alloc_block+0x177/0x210
Call Trace:
<TASK>
xfs_btree_new_iroot+0xdf/0x520
xfs_btree_make_block_unfull+0x10d/0x1c0
xfs_btree_insrec+0x364/0x790
xfs_btree_insert+0xaa/0x210
xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real+0x1fe/0x9a0
xfs_bmapi_allocate+0x34c/0x420
xfs_bmapi_write+0x53c/0x9c0
xfs_alloc_file_space+0xee/0x320
xfs_file_fallocate+0x36b/0x450
vfs_fallocate+0x148/0x340
__x64_sys_fallocate+0x3c/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa
Why the allocation failed at this point is unknown, but is likely
that we ran the transaction out of reserved space and filesystem out
of space with bmbt blocks because of all the minlen allocations
being done causing worst case fragmentation of a large allocation.
Regardless of the cause, we've then called xfs_bmapi_finish() which
calls xfs_btree_del_cursor(cur, error) to tear down the cursor.
So we have a failed operation, error != 0, cur->bc_ino.allocated > 0
and the filesystem is still up. The assert fails to take into
account that allocation can fail with an error and the transaction
teardown will shut the filesystem down if necessary. i.e. the
assert needs to check "|| error != 0" as well, because at this point
shutdown is pending because the current transaction is dirty....
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
index 786ec1cb1bba..32100cfb9dfc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
@@ -445,8 +445,14 @@ xfs_btree_del_cursor(
break;
}
+ /*
+ * If we are doing a BMBT update, the number of unaccounted blocks
+ * allocated during this cursor life time should be zero. If it's not
+ * zero, then we should be shut down or on our way to shutdown due to
+ * cancelling a dirty transaction on error.
+ */
ASSERT(cur->bc_btnum != XFS_BTNUM_BMAP || cur->bc_ino.allocated == 0 ||
- xfs_is_shutdown(cur->bc_mp));
+ xfs_is_shutdown(cur->bc_mp) || error != 0);
if (unlikely(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_STAGING))
kmem_free(cur->bc_ops);
if (!(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_LONG_PTRS) && cur->bc_ag.pag)
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 2:21 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: small fixes for 5.19 cycle Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 2:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: avoid unnecessary runtime sibling pointer endian conversions Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 3:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 2:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't assert fail on perag references on teardown Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 3:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 4:00 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 4:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-24 2:21 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-05-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: assert in xfs_btree_del_cursor should take into account error Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524022158.1849458-4-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox