From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] generic/623: fix test for runing on overlayfs
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 15:34:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220601123406.265475-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
For this test to run on overlayfs we open a different file to perform
shutdown while keeping the writeback target file open.
xfs_io -c fsync perform fsync also on the writeback target file, which
is needed for triggering the write fault.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
Zorro,
Following your comment on v1, this version does not change the
behavior of the test when running on non-overlayfs.
I tested that this test passes for both xfs and overlayfs+xfs on v5.18
and tested that both configs fail with the same warning on v5.10.109.
Thanks,
Amir.
tests/generic/623 | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/generic/623 b/tests/generic/623
index ea016d91..5971717c 100755
--- a/tests/generic/623
+++ b/tests/generic/623
@@ -24,10 +24,22 @@ _scratch_mount
# XFS had a regression where it failed to check shutdown status in the fault
# path. This produced an iomap warning because writeback failure clears Uptodate
# status on the page.
+
+# For this test to run on overlayfs we open a different file to perform
+# shutdown while keeping the writeback target file open.
+# xfs_io -c fsync post-shutdown performs fsync also on the writeback target file,
+# which is critical for trigerring the writeback failure.
+shutdown_cmd=()
+shutdown_handle="$(_scratch_shutdown_handle)"
+if [ "$shutdown_handle" != "$SCRATCH_MNT" ];then
+ shutdown_cmd+=("-c" "open $shutdown_handle")
+fi
+shutdown_cmd+=("-c" "shutdown")
+
file=$SCRATCH_MNT/file
$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 0 4k" -c fsync $file | _filter_xfs_io
ulimit -c 0
-$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "mmap 0 4k" -c "mwrite 0 4k" -c shutdown -c fsync \
+$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "mmap 0 4k" -c "mwrite 0 4k" "${shutdown_cmd[@]}" -c fsync \
-c "mwrite 0 4k" $file | _filter_xfs_io
# success, all done
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-01 12:34 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2022-06-01 23:44 ` [PATCH v2] generic/623: fix test for runing on overlayfs Dave Chinner
2022-06-02 4:19 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220601123406.265475-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox