From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7760CCA483 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233855AbiFHJK0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 05:10:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46672 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233788AbiFHJJP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 05:09:15 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486222DD58; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 01:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 11A6068AA6; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 10:26:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 10:26:54 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Christian Brauner , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , "Darrick J . Wong" , Brian Foster , Luis Chamberlain , Adam Manzanares , Tyler Hicks , linux-xfs , fstests , Christian Brauner , Yang Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 CANDIDATE 1/8] xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories Message-ID: <20220608082654.GA16753@lst.de> References: <20220601104547.260949-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20220601104547.260949-2-amir73il@gmail.com> <20220602005238.GK227878@dread.disaster.area> <20220602103149.gc6b5hzkense5nrs@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 11:25:10AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > TBH, I am having a hard time following the expected vs. actual > behavior in all the cases at all points in time. > > Christoph, > > As the author of this patch, do you have an opinion w.r.t backporting > this patch alongs with vs. independent of followup fixes? > wait for future fixes yet to come? To me backporting it seems good and useful, as it fixes a relatively big problem. The remaining issues seem minor compared to that.