public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup
Date: Fri,  8 Jul 2022 09:52:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707235259.1097443-5-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220707235259.1097443-1-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Avoid an extra atomic operation in the non-trylock case by only
doing a trylock if the XBF_TRYLOCK flag is set. This follows the
pattern in the IO path with NOWAIT semantics where the
"trylock-fail-lock" path showed 5-10% reduced throughput compared to
just using single lock call when not under NOWAIT conditions. So
make that same change here, too.

See commit 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression") for details.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
[hch: split from a larger patch]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 81ca951b451a..374c4e508b12 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -534,11 +534,12 @@ xfs_buf_find_lock(
 	struct xfs_buf          *bp,
 	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags)
 {
-	if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
-		if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+	if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+		if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
 			XFS_STATS_INC(bp->b_mount, xb_busy_locked);
 			return -EAGAIN;
 		}
+	} else {
 		xfs_buf_lock(bp);
 		XFS_STATS_INC(bp->b_mount, xb_get_locked_waited);
 	}
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-07 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-07 23:52 [PATCH 0/6 v3] xfs: lockless buffer lookups Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: rework xfs_buf_incore() API Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: break up xfs_buf_find() into individual pieces Dave Chinner
2022-07-09 22:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: merge xfs_buf_find() and xfs_buf_get_map() Dave Chinner
2022-07-10  0:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-11  5:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-12  0:01     ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove a superflous hash lookup when inserting new buffers Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: lockless buffer lookup Dave Chinner
2022-07-10  0:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-13 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] xfs: lockless buffer lookups Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-13 17:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-14  1:32   ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-14  2:11     ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-27  6:08 [PATCH 0/6 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-06-27  6:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 22:00   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220707235259.1097443-5-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox