From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:52:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707235259.1097443-5-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220707235259.1097443-1-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Avoid an extra atomic operation in the non-trylock case by only
doing a trylock if the XBF_TRYLOCK flag is set. This follows the
pattern in the IO path with NOWAIT semantics where the
"trylock-fail-lock" path showed 5-10% reduced throughput compared to
just using single lock call when not under NOWAIT conditions. So
make that same change here, too.
See commit 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression") for details.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
[hch: split from a larger patch]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 81ca951b451a..374c4e508b12 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -534,11 +534,12 @@ xfs_buf_find_lock(
struct xfs_buf *bp,
xfs_buf_flags_t flags)
{
- if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
- if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+ if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
+ if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp)) {
XFS_STATS_INC(bp->b_mount, xb_busy_locked);
return -EAGAIN;
}
+ } else {
xfs_buf_lock(bp);
XFS_STATS_INC(bp->b_mount, xb_get_locked_waited);
}
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 23:52 [PATCH 0/6 v3] xfs: lockless buffer lookups Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: rework xfs_buf_incore() API Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: break up xfs_buf_find() into individual pieces Dave Chinner
2022-07-09 22:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: merge xfs_buf_find() and xfs_buf_get_map() Dave Chinner
2022-07-10 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-11 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-12 0:01 ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove a superflous hash lookup when inserting new buffers Dave Chinner
2022-07-07 23:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: lockless buffer lookup Dave Chinner
2022-07-10 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-13 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] xfs: lockless buffer lookups Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-13 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-14 1:32 ` Dave Chinner
2022-07-14 2:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-27 6:08 [PATCH 0/6 v2] " Dave Chinner
2022-06-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: reduce the number of atomic when locking a buffer after lookup Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 22:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707235259.1097443-5-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox