From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_repair: retain superblock buffer to avoid write hook deadlock
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:15:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220811221541.GQ3600936@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166007921743.3294543.7334567013352169774.stgit@magnolia>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:06:57PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> Every now and then I experience the following deadlock in xfs_repair
> when I'm running the offline repair fuzz tests:
>
> #0 futex_wait (private=0, expected=2, futex_word=0x55555566df70) at ../sysdeps/nptl/futex-internal.h:146
> #1 __GI___lll_lock_wait (futex=futex@entry=0x55555566df70, private=0) at ./nptl/lowlevellock.c:49
> #2 lll_mutex_lock_optimized (mutex=0x55555566df70) at ./nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:48
> #3 ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x55555566df70) at ./nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:93
> #4 cache_shake (cache=cache@entry=0x55555566de60, priority=priority@entry=2, purge=purge@entry=false) at cache.c:231
> #5 cache_node_get (cache=cache@entry=0x55555566de60, key=key@entry=0x7fffe55e01b0, nodep=nodep@entry=0x7fffe55e0168) at cache.c:452
> #6 __cache_lookup (key=key@entry=0x7fffe55e01b0, flags=0, bpp=bpp@entry=0x7fffe55e0228) at rdwr.c:405
> #7 libxfs_getbuf_flags (btp=0x55555566de00, blkno=0, len=<optimized out>, flags=<optimized out>, bpp=0x7fffe55e0228) at rdwr.c:457
> #8 libxfs_buf_read_map (btp=0x55555566de00, map=map@entry=0x7fffe55e0280, nmaps=nmaps@entry=1, flags=flags@entry=0, bpp=bpp@entry=0x7fffe55e0278, ops=0x5555556233e0 <xfs_sb_buf_ops>)
> at rdwr.c:704
> #9 libxfs_buf_read (ops=<optimized out>, bpp=0x7fffe55e0278, flags=0, numblks=<optimized out>, blkno=0, target=<optimized out>)
> at /storage/home/djwong/cdev/work/xfsprogs/build-x86_64/libxfs/libxfs_io.h:195
> #10 libxfs_getsb (mp=mp@entry=0x7fffffffd690) at rdwr.c:162
> #11 force_needsrepair (mp=0x7fffffffd690) at xfs_repair.c:924
> #12 repair_capture_writeback (bp=<optimized out>) at xfs_repair.c:1000
> #13 libxfs_bwrite (bp=0x7fffe011e530) at rdwr.c:869
> #14 cache_shake (cache=cache@entry=0x55555566de60, priority=priority@entry=2, purge=purge@entry=false) at cache.c:240
> #15 cache_node_get (cache=cache@entry=0x55555566de60, key=key@entry=0x7fffe55e0470, nodep=nodep@entry=0x7fffe55e0428) at cache.c:452
> #16 __cache_lookup (key=key@entry=0x7fffe55e0470, flags=1, bpp=bpp@entry=0x7fffe55e0538) at rdwr.c:405
> #17 libxfs_getbuf_flags (btp=0x55555566de00, blkno=12736, len=<optimized out>, flags=<optimized out>, bpp=0x7fffe55e0538) at rdwr.c:457
> #18 __libxfs_buf_get_map (btp=<optimized out>, map=map@entry=0x7fffe55e05b0, nmaps=<optimized out>, flags=flags@entry=1, bpp=bpp@entry=0x7fffe55e0538) at rdwr.c:501
> #19 libxfs_buf_get_map (btp=<optimized out>, map=map@entry=0x7fffe55e05b0, nmaps=<optimized out>, flags=flags@entry=1, bpp=bpp@entry=0x7fffe55e0538) at rdwr.c:525
> #20 pf_queue_io (args=args@entry=0x5555556722c0, map=map@entry=0x7fffe55e05b0, nmaps=<optimized out>, flag=flag@entry=11) at prefetch.c:124
> #21 pf_read_bmbt_reclist (args=0x5555556722c0, rp=<optimized out>, numrecs=78) at prefetch.c:220
> #22 pf_scan_lbtree (dbno=dbno@entry=1211, level=level@entry=1, isadir=isadir@entry=1, args=args@entry=0x5555556722c0, func=0x55555557f240 <pf_scanfunc_bmap>) at prefetch.c:298
> #23 pf_read_btinode (isadir=1, dino=<optimized out>, args=0x5555556722c0) at prefetch.c:385
> #24 pf_read_inode_dirs (args=args@entry=0x5555556722c0, bp=bp@entry=0x7fffdc023790) at prefetch.c:459
> #25 pf_read_inode_dirs (bp=<optimized out>, args=0x5555556722c0) at prefetch.c:411
> #26 pf_batch_read (args=args@entry=0x5555556722c0, which=which@entry=PF_PRIMARY, buf=buf@entry=0x7fffd001d000) at prefetch.c:609
> #27 pf_io_worker (param=0x5555556722c0) at prefetch.c:673
> #28 start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
> #29 clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81
>
> From this stack trace, we see that xfs_repair's prefetch module is
> getting some xfs_buf objects ahead of initiating a read (#19). The
> buffer cache has hit its limit, so it calls cache_shake (#14) to free
> some unused xfs_bufs. The buffer it finds is a dirty buffer, so it
> calls libxfs_bwrite to flush it out to disk, which in turn invokes the
> buffer write hook that xfs_repair set up in 3b7667cb to mark the ondisk
> filesystem's superblock as NEEDSREPAIR until repair actually completes.
>
> Unfortunately, the NEEDSREPAIR handler itself needs to grab the
> superblock buffer, so it makes another call into the buffer cache (#9),
> which sees that the cache is full and tries to shake it(#4). Hence we
> deadlock on cm_mutex because shaking is not reentrant.
>
> Fix this by retaining a reference to the superblock buffer when possible
> so that the writeback hook doesn't have to access the buffer cache to
> set NEEDSREPAIR.
If we are going to "retain" a permanent reference to the superblock
buffer, can we just do it the same way as the kernel does at mount
time? i.e. do this for every xfs_mount instance via an uncached
buffer, and attach it to mp->m_sb_bp so that the
superblock can be grabbed at any time in any context without needing
to hit the buffer cache?
If we've got code that exists to do this in a generic manner that
brings userspace closer to kernel behaviour, then that's what we
should use rather than create a special one-off implementation for a
single userspace binary...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-11 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 21:06 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] xfsprogs: random fixes for 5.19 Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_repair: fix printf format specifiers on 32-bit platforms Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-09 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs_repair: retain superblock buffer to avoid write hook deadlock Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-11 18:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 22:15 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-08-16 2:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220811221541.GQ3600936@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox