From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't track the AGFL buffer in the scrub AG context
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:32:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221013223247.GZ3600936@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166473478879.1083155.7048621417340358108.stgit@magnolia>
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:19:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> While scrubbing an allocation group, we don't need to hold the AGFL
> buffer as part of the scrub context. All that is necessary to lock an
> AG is to hold the AGI and AGF buffers, so fix all the existing users of
> the AGFL buffer to grab them only when necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> fs/xfs/scrub/agheader_repair.c | 1 -
> fs/xfs/scrub/common.c | 8 -------
> fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 11 +++++----
> fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> @@ -717,24 +731,21 @@ xchk_agfl(
>
> /* Allocate buffer to ensure uniqueness of AGFL entries. */
> agf = sc->sa.agf_bp->b_addr;
> - agflcount = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount);
> - if (agflcount > xfs_agfl_size(sc->mp)) {
> + sai.agflcount = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount);
> + if (sai.agflcount > xfs_agfl_size(sc->mp)) {
> xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agf_bp);
> goto out;
> }
> - memset(&sai, 0, sizeof(sai));
> - sai.sc = sc;
> - sai.sz_entries = agflcount;
> - sai.entries = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(xfs_agblock_t) * agflcount,
> - KM_MAYFAIL);
> + sai.entries = kvcalloc(sai.agflcount, sizeof(xfs_agblock_t),
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
The code is fine, but I'm curious why kvcalloc()? Are there really
devices out there with sector sizes large than 4kB that we support?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-02 18:19 [PATCHSET v23.1 0/4] xfs: fix handling of AG[IF] header buffers during scrub Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-02 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't track the AGFL buffer in the scrub AG context Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-13 22:32 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-10-02 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: set the buffer type after holding the AG[IF] across trans_roll Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-13 22:25 ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-13 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-14 1:28 ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-24 4:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-31 18:08 ` [PATCH v23.2 3/4] xfs: log the AGI/AGF buffers when rolling transactions during an AG repair Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-31 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-02 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fully initialize xfs_da_args in xchk_directory_blocks Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-13 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-02 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: make AGFL repair function avoid crosslinked blocks Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-13 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221013223247.GZ3600936@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox