public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: h@magnolia, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfs: fix FORTIFY_SOURCE complaints about log item memcpy
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:40:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202210251139.3612057E@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1cFxnea750izJd7@magnolia>

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:38:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> <nod> I realized that these helpers introducing unsafe memcpy weren't
> needed.  Later on after chatting with dchinner a bit I came to the
> conclusion that we might as well convert most of the _copy_format
> functions to memcpy the structure head and flex array separately since
> that function is converting an ondisk log item into its in-memory
> representation, and some day we'll make those struct fields endian safe.
> They aren't now, and that's one of the (many) gaping holes that need
> fixing.

Ah, perfect! Yeah, this is one of the other standard solutions -- header
and flex array handled separately. I'm still working on APIs to handle
the common cases, though. XFS probably will want to keep it separate as
you've done.

> I sent my candidate fixes series to the list just now.

Thanks! I'll go check them out.

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20  0:04 [RFC PATCH] xfs: fix FORTIFY_SOURCE complaints about log item memcpy Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-20  3:05 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-24 16:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-24 21:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-25 18:40     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-10-24 22:32   ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-25 18:45     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202210251139.3612057E@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=h@magnolia \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox