public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, <billodo@redhat.com>,
	<chandan.babu@oracle.com>, <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	<guoxuenan@huawei.com>, <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix sb write verify for lazysbcount
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:17:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221031141731.GB1277642@ceph-admin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221030220441.GH3600936@dread.disaster.area>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:04:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 03:16:01PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:05:21AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:25:04PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > > not pass, therefore it will not write a clean umount record
> > > > at umount. I also haven't found a code suitable for adding
> > > > such checks.
> > > 
> > > xfs_unmountfs just prior to unmounting the log.
> > 
> > 
> > I tried to add an extra check in xfs_log_unmount_write, when m_icount <
> > m_ifree, it will not write a umount log record, after which the summary
> > counters will be recalculated at next mount. If m_ifree greater than
> > m_icount in memory, sb_i{count,free} (the ondisk superblock inode counters)
> > maybe incorrect even after unmount filesystem. After adding such checks,
> > it can be corrected on the next mount, instead of going undetected in
> > subsequent mounts.
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > index f1f44c006ab3..e4903c15019e 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > @@ -1038,7 +1038,9 @@ xfs_log_unmount_write(
> >  	 * more details.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (XFS_TEST_ERROR(xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS), mp,
> > -			XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC)) {
> > +			XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC) ||
> > +			(percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount) <
> > +			 percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_ifree))) {
> >  		xfs_alert(mp, "%s: will fix summary counters at next mount",
> >  				__func__);
> >  		return;
> 
> The log code is not the layer at which the mount structures
> should be verified. xfs_unmountfs() is where the mount is cleaned up
> and all activity is flushed and waited on. THis is where the mount
> counters should be checked, before we unmount the log.
> 
> Indeed, if you check the mount counters prior to calling
> xfs_log_unmount_write(), you could call this:
> 
> 	xfs_alert(mp, "ifree/icount mismatch at unmount");
> 	xfs_fs_mark_sick(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS);
> 
> i.e. check the mount state at the correct level and propagate the
> sickness into the mount state and the log code will just do the
> right thing....
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
 
Ok, I'll resend a patch and fix the above issue, thanks a lot.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-31 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-22  2:03 [PATCH v1] xfs: fix sb write verify for lazysbcount Long Li
2022-10-22  2:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-22 12:01   ` Long Li
2022-10-22 21:16     ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-24  4:07       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-24  5:43         ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-24 12:28           ` Long Li
2022-10-24  5:06       ` Long Li
2022-10-25  9:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Long Li
2022-10-25 18:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-26  9:13     ` Long Li
2022-10-26 18:52       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-27 13:25         ` Long Li
2022-10-27 16:05           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-10-29  7:16             ` Long Li
2022-10-30 22:04               ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-31 14:17                 ` Long Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221031141731.GB1277642@ceph-admin \
    --to=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=billodo@redhat.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoxuenan@huawei.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox