From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events.
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:51:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221103205107.GG3600936@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221103133252.ycw5awieh7ckiih7@ovpn-192-135.brq.redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 02:32:52PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:19:06PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > From: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
> >
> > As of now only device names are printed out over __xfs_printk().
> > The device names are not persistent across reboots which in case
> > of searching for origin of corruption brings another task to properly
> > identify the devices. This patch add XFS UUID upon every mount/umount
> > event which will make the identification much easier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
> > [sandeen: rebase onto current upstream kernel]
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> it is a simple enough, nonintrusive change so it may not really matter as
> much, but I was wondering if there is a way to map the device name to
> the fs UUID already and I think there may be.
>
> I know that udev daemon is constantly scanning devices then they are
> closed in order to be able to read the signatures. It should know
> exactly what is on the device and I know it is able to track the history
> of changes. What I am not sure about is whether it is already logged
> somewhere?
>
> If it's not already, maybe it can be done and then we can cross
> reference kernel log with udev log when tracking down problems to see
> exactly what is going on without needing to sprinkle UUIDs in kernel log ?
>
> Any thoughts?
Don't like it. Emitting the UUID on the fs mount/unmount log message
is a trivial change that has zero impact on anything as well as
being really easy for log scrapers to deal with.
Screwing around with udev to manage and/or find this correlationi
is ... unnecssarily awful.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <l2a3zCkMp4g9yjUsn7MdftktWgI6xqW45ngK9WGU8-OQp_SWHRFpO5xZbUySxT3QRk1C4PyeLgqoVEY3VRRH_w==@protonmail.internalid>
2022-11-01 17:19 ` [PATCH] xfs: Print XFS UUID on mount and umount events Eric Sandeen
2022-11-02 15:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-02 20:38 ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-03 13:32 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-11-03 14:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-11-03 15:16 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-11-03 20:51 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-11-03 22:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-04 16:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2022-11-04 9:21 ` Lukas Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221103205107.GG3600936@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox