From: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: test files written size as expected
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 11:23:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221105032329.2067299-1-zlang@kernel.org> (raw)
Test nfs and its underlying fs, make sure file size as expected
after writting a file, and the speculative allocation space can
be shrunken.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
---
Hi,
The original bug reproducer is:
1. mount nfs3 backed by xfs
2. dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfs/10M bs=1M count=10
3. du -sh /nfs/10M
16M /nfs/10M
As this was a xfs issue, so cc linux-xfs@ to get review.
Thanks,
Zorro
tests/nfs/002 | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/nfs/002.out | 2 ++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/nfs/002
create mode 100644 tests/nfs/002.out
diff --git a/tests/nfs/002 b/tests/nfs/002
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..3d29958d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/nfs/002
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test 002
+#
+# Make sure nfs gets expected file size after writting a big sized file. It's
+# not only testing nfs, test its underlying fs too. For example a known old bug
+# on xfs (underlying fs) caused nfs get larger file size (e.g. 16M) after
+# writting 10M data to a file. It's fixed by a series of patches around
+# 579b62faa5fb16 ("xfs: add background scanning to clear eofblocks inodes")
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto rw
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs nfs
+_require_test
+
+localfile=$TEST_DIR/testfile.$seq
+rm -rf $localfile
+
+$XFS_IO_PROG -f -t -c "pwrite 0 10m" -c "fsync" $localfile >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+block_size=`stat -c '%B' $localfile`
+iblocks_expected=$((10 * 1024 * 1024 / $block_size))
+# Try several times for the speculative allocated file size can be shrunken
+res=1
+for ((i=0; i<10; i++));do
+ iblocks_real=`stat -c '%b' $localfile`
+ if [ "$iblocks_expected" = "$iblocks_real" ];then
+ res=0
+ break
+ fi
+ sleep 10
+done
+if [ $res -ne 0 ];then
+ echo "Write $iblocks_expected blocks, but get $iblocks_real blocks"
+fi
+
+echo "Silence is golden"
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/nfs/002.out b/tests/nfs/002.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..61705c7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/nfs/002.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 002
+Silence is golden
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-05 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-05 3:23 Zorro Lang [this message]
2022-11-07 4:05 ` [PATCH] nfs: test files written size as expected Murphy Zhou
2022-11-21 18:47 ` Zorro Lang
2022-11-21 19:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-22 6:09 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221105032329.2067299-1-zlang@kernel.org \
--to=zlang@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox