* [PATCH v1 1/2] xfs: fix typo from filesystes to filesystems @ 2023-02-09 3:16 Xiaole He 2023-02-09 3:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] libxfs: fix reservation space for removing transaction Xiaole He 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Xiaole He @ 2023-02-09 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-xfs Cc: djwong, dchinner, chandan.babu, huhai, zhangshida, Xiaole He, Xiaole He Signed-off-by: Xiaole He <hexiaole@kylinos.cn> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c index f8ff81c3de76..7ebef43e3c1f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs_alloc_arg_t *); STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *); /* - * Size of the AGFL. For CRC-enabled filesystes we steal a couple of slots in + * Size of the AGFL. For CRC-enabled filesystems we steal a couple of slots in * the beginning of the block for a proper header with the location information * and CRC. */ -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 2/2] libxfs: fix reservation space for removing transaction 2023-02-09 3:16 [PATCH v1 1/2] xfs: fix typo from filesystes to filesystems Xiaole He @ 2023-02-09 3:16 ` Xiaole He 2023-02-09 5:43 ` Dave Chinner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Xiaole He @ 2023-02-09 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-xfs Cc: djwong, dchinner, chandan.babu, huhai, zhangshida, Xiaole He, Xiaole He In libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c: /* libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c begin */ 1 /* 2 * For removing a directory entry we can modify: 3 * the parent directory inode: inode size 4 * the removed inode: inode size 5 * the directory btree could join: (max depth + v2) * dir block size 6 * the directory bmap btree could join or split: (max depth + v2) * blocksize 7 * And the bmap_finish transaction can free the dir and bmap blocks giving: 8 * the agf for the ag in which the blocks live: 2 * sector size 9 * the agfl for the ag in which the blocks live: 2 * sector size 10 * the superblock for the free block count: sector size 11 ... 12 */ 13 STATIC uint 14 xfs_calc_remove_reservation( 15 struct xfs_mount *mp) 16 { 17 return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + 18 xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp) + 19 max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) + 20 xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp), 21 XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))), 22 (xfs_calc_buf_res(4, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + 23 ... 24 } /* libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c end */ Above lines 8-10 indicates there has 5 sector size of space to be reserved, but the above line 22 only reserve 4 sector size of space, this patch fix the problem and sorry for not notice this problem at Commit d3e53ab7cdc7fabb8c94137e335634e0ed4691e8 ("xfs: fix inode reservation space for removing transaction"). Signed-off-by: Xiaole He <hexiaole@kylinos.cn> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c index 5b2f27cbdb80..6064fae042e8 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ xfs_calc_remove_reservation( max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) + xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp), XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))), - (xfs_calc_buf_res(4, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + + (xfs_calc_buf_res(5, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_block_count(mp, 2), XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)))); } -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] libxfs: fix reservation space for removing transaction 2023-02-09 3:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] libxfs: fix reservation space for removing transaction Xiaole He @ 2023-02-09 5:43 ` Dave Chinner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Chinner @ 2023-02-09 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xiaole He Cc: linux-xfs, djwong, dchinner, chandan.babu, huhai, zhangshida, Xiaole He On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:16:37AM +0800, Xiaole He wrote: > In libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c: > > /* libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c begin */ > 1 /* > 2 * For removing a directory entry we can modify: > 3 * the parent directory inode: inode size > 4 * the removed inode: inode size > 5 * the directory btree could join: (max depth + v2) * dir block size > 6 * the directory bmap btree could join or split: (max depth + v2) * blocksize > 7 * And the bmap_finish transaction can free the dir and bmap blocks giving: > 8 * the agf for the ag in which the blocks live: 2 * sector size > 9 * the agfl for the ag in which the blocks live: 2 * sector size > 10 * the superblock for the free block count: sector size > 11 ... > 12 */ > 13 STATIC uint > 14 xfs_calc_remove_reservation( > 15 struct xfs_mount *mp) > 16 { > 17 return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + > 18 xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp) + > 19 max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 2) + > 20 xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DIROP_LOG_COUNT(mp), > 21 XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))), > 22 (xfs_calc_buf_res(4, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + > 23 ... > 24 } > /* libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c end */ > > Above lines 8-10 indicates there has 5 sector size of space to be > reserved, but the above line 22 only reserve 4 sector size of space, We don't log the superblock when lazycount=1 (i.e. default behaviour for all v5 filesystems and almost all v4 filesystems created in the last 15 years). Hence a count of 4 is actually correct for almost all the production XFS filesystems out there. Even ignoring that little detail, I don't think the comment you are referencing reflects how extent freeing works these days. There is no "bmap_finish" transaction in a directory entry remove operation anymore - that was replaced long ago by generic intent-based deferred log operations. Those deferred ops only process a single extent freeing at a time (i.e. inserting a single new freespace extent into the freespace btrees), so I don't think this comment reflects reality anymore. Now that we have minimum 64MB log sizes in mkfs, and a historical reservation calculation for min log size calculations, we can reduce the transaction reservation sizes down to match the current reality without having to care about it changing minimum log sizes. Hence I think it's time we actually fixed these "bmap_finish multiple extent free" over-estimations to reflect the current reality of only processing a single extent per intent. That means fixing the comments and the code. :) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-09 5:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-02-09 3:16 [PATCH v1 1/2] xfs: fix typo from filesystes to filesystems Xiaole He 2023-02-09 3:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] libxfs: fix reservation space for removing transaction Xiaole He 2023-02-09 5:43 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox