Re: [PATCH 5.10 CANDIDATE 0/2] Two more xfs backports for 5.10.y (from v5.11)

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>]

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:06:21PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Darrick,
> 
> These two backports were selected by Chandan for 5.4.y, but are
> currently missing from 5.10.y.
> 
> I've put them through the usual kdevops testing routine.
> 
> This is the second time that I have considered patch #2 for 5.10.y.
> The last time around, I observed increased the probablity of a known
> buffer corruption assertion when running xfs/076, so I suspected
> a regression, and dropped it from the submission [1].
> 
> At the time, the alleged regression happened only in the kdevops setup
> and neither I nor Brain were able to understand why that happens [2].
> This time around, the kdevops setup did not observe that odd regression.

Heh, I had a roommate once whose name got misspelled to Brain on the
water bills, and I still chuckle every time I see that. ;)

Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220601104547.260949-1-amir73il@gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/YpY6hUknor2S1iMd@bfoster/T/#mf1add66b8309a75a8984f28ea08718f22033bce7
> 
> Brian Foster (1):
>   xfs: don't reuse busy extents on extent trim
> 
> Darrick J. Wong (1):
>   xfs: shut down the filesystem if we screw up quota reservation
> 
>  fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 14 --------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>