Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
To: djwong@kernel.org
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	amir73il@gmail.com, leah.rumancik@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 CANDIDATE] xfs: fix forkoff miscalculation related to XFS_LITINO(mp)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 08:36:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421030619.62047-1-chandan.babu@oracle.com> (raw)

From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>

commit ada49d64fb3538144192181db05de17e2ffc3551 upstream.

Currently, commit e9e2eae89ddb dropped a (int) decoration from
XFS_LITINO(mp), and since sizeof() expression is also involved,
the result of XFS_LITINO(mp) is simply as the size_t type
(commonly unsigned long).

Considering the expression in xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit():
  offset = (XFS_LITINO(mp) - bytes) >> 3;
let "bytes" be (int)340, and
    "XFS_LITINO(mp)" be (unsigned long)336.

on 64-bit platform, the expression is
  offset = ((unsigned long)336 - (int)340) >> 3 =
           (int)(0xfffffffffffffffcUL >> 3) = -1

but on 32-bit platform, the expression is
  offset = ((unsigned long)336 - (int)340) >> 3 =
           (int)(0xfffffffcUL >> 3) = 0x1fffffff
instead.

so offset becomes a large positive number on 32-bit platform, and
cause xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit() returns maxforkoff rather than 0.

Therefore, one result is
  "ASSERT(new_size <= XFS_IFORK_SIZE(ip, whichfork));"

assertion failure in xfs_idata_realloc(), which was also the root
cause of the original bugreport from Dennis, see:
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894177

And it can also be manually triggered with the following commands:
  $ touch a;
  $ setfattr -n user.0 -v "`seq 0 80`" a;
  $ setfattr -n user.1 -v "`seq 0 80`" a

on 32-bit platform.

Fix the case in xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit() by bailing out
"XFS_LITINO(mp) < bytes" in advance suggested by Eric and a misleading
comment together with this bugfix suggested by Darrick. It seems the
other users of XFS_LITINO(mp) are not impacted.

Fixes: e9e2eae89ddb ("xfs: only check the superblock version for dinode size calculation")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.7+
Reported-and-tested-by: Dennis Gilmore <dgilmore@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
---

Hi Darrick,

I had missed this commit when backporting fixes from 5.11 and 5.12. I
have executed 10 iterations of fstests via kdevops and did not notice
any new regressions.

Please ack this patch.

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
index f5b16120c64d..2b74b6e9a354 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ xfs_attr_copy_value(
  *========================================================================*/
 
 /*
- * Query whether the requested number of additional bytes of extended
+ * Query whether the total requested number of attr fork bytes of extended
  * attribute space will be able to fit inline.
  *
  * Returns zero if not, else the di_forkoff fork offset to be used in the
@@ -455,6 +455,12 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit(
 	int			maxforkoff;
 	int			offset;
 
+	/*
+	 * Check if the new size could fit at all first:
+	 */
+	if (bytes > XFS_LITINO(mp))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* rounded down */
 	offset = (XFS_LITINO(mp) - bytes) >> 3;
 
-- 
2.39.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-21  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-21  3:06 Chandan Babu R [this message]
2023-04-21 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.4 CANDIDATE] xfs: fix forkoff miscalculation related to XFS_LITINO(mp) Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230421030619.62047-1-chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --to=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=leah.rumancik@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox