From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix livelock in delayed allocation at ENOSPC
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:53:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230422035300.GL360889@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421222440.2722482-1-david@fromorbit.com>
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 08:24:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> On a filesystem with a non-zero stripe unit and a large sequential
> write, delayed allocation will set a minimum allocation length of
> the stripe unit. If allocation fails because there are no extents
> long enough for an aligned minlen allocation, it is supposed to
> fall back to unaligned allocation which allows single block extents
> to be allocated.
>
> When the allocator code was rewritting in the 6.3 cycle, this
> fallback was broken - the old code used args->fsbno as the both the
> allocation target and the allocation result, the new code passes the
> target as a separate parameter. The conversion didn't handle the
> aligned->unaligned fallback path correctly - it reset args->fsbno to
> the target fsbno on failure which broke allocation failure detection
> in the high level code and so it never fell back to unaligned
> allocations.
>
> This resulted in a loop in writeback trying to allocate an aligned
> block, getting a false positive success, trying to insert the result
> in the BMBT. This did nothing because the extent already was in the
> BMBT (merge results in an unchanged extent) and so it returned the
> prior extent to the conversion code as the current iomap.
>
> Because the iomap returned didn't cover the offset we tried to map,
> xfs_convert_blocks() then retries the allocation, which fails in the
> same way and now we have a livelock.
>
> Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 85843327094f ("xfs: factor xfs_bmap_btalloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Will give this one a spin through the test system over the weekend.
In the meantime, can one of you come up with a reproducer? From the
description, it doesn't sound like that should be too hard -- mount with
no stripe unit set, fragment the free space, mount with a stripe unit
set, then run the fs out of space?
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 1a4e446194dd..b512de0540d5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -3540,7 +3540,6 @@ xfs_bmap_btalloc_at_eof(
> * original non-aligned state so the caller can proceed on allocation
> * failure as if this function was never called.
> */
> - args->fsbno = ap->blkno;
> args->alignment = 1;
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-22 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 22:24 [PATCH] xfs: fix livelock in delayed allocation at ENOSPC Dave Chinner
2023-04-22 3:53 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-04-23 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-24 14:27 ` Brian Foster
2023-04-25 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-26 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-26 23:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-27 0:11 ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-27 0:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-04-27 5:26 ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-27 15:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230422035300.GL360889@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox