From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] xfs: drop submit side trans alloc for append ioends
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 17:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023042211-harmonica-ecology-a31b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419161813.2044576-1-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 07:18:13PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
>
> commit 7cd3099f4925d7c15887d1940ebd65acd66100f5 upstream.
>
> Per-inode ioend completion batching has a log reservation deadlock
> vector between preallocated append transactions and transactions
> that are acquired at completion time for other purposes (i.e.,
> unwritten extent conversion or COW fork remaps). For example, if the
> ioend completion workqueue task executes on a batch of ioends that
> are sorted such that an append ioend sits at the tail, it's possible
> for the outstanding append transaction reservation to block
> allocation of transactions required to process preceding ioends in
> the list.
>
> Append ioend completion is historically the common path for on-disk
> inode size updates. While file extending writes may have completed
> sometime earlier, the on-disk inode size is only updated after
> successful writeback completion. These transactions are preallocated
> serially from writeback context to mitigate concurrency and
> associated log reservation pressure across completions processed by
> multi-threaded workqueue tasks.
>
> However, now that delalloc blocks unconditionally map to unwritten
> extents at physical block allocation time, size updates via append
> ioends are relatively rare. This means that inode size updates most
> commonly occur as part of the preexisting completion time
> transaction to convert unwritten extents. As a result, there is no
> longer a strong need to preallocate size update transactions.
>
> Remove the preallocation of inode size update transactions to avoid
> the ioend completion processing log reservation deadlock. Instead,
> continue to send all potential size extending ioends to workqueue
> context for completion and allocate the transaction from that
> context. This ensures that no outstanding log reservation is owned
> by the ioend completion worker task when it begins to process
> ioends.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/CAOQ4uxjj2UqA0h4Y31NbmpHksMhVrXfXjLG4Tnz3zq_UR-3gSA@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Greg,
>
> One more fix from v5.13 that I missed from my backports.
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-22 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-19 16:18 [PATCH 5.10] xfs: drop submit side trans alloc for append ioends Amir Goldstein
2023-04-22 15:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023042211-harmonica-ecology-a31b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=ct@flyingcircus.io \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=leah.rumancik@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox