Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: fix ag count overflow during growfs

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:18:44AM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> I found a corruption during growfs:
> 
>  XFS (loop0): Internal error agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks at line 3661 of
>    file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c.  Caller __xfs_free_extent+0x28e/0x3c0
>  CPU: 0 PID: 573 Comm: xfs_growfs Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230420-00001-gda8c95746257
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x70
>   xfs_corruption_error+0x134/0x150
>   __xfs_free_extent+0x2c1/0x3c0
>   xfs_ag_extend_space+0x291/0x3e0
>   xfs_growfs_data+0xd72/0xe90
>   xfs_file_ioctl+0x5f9/0x14a0
>   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x13e/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>  XFS (loop0): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
>  XFS (loop0): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1097 of file
>    fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.  Caller xfs_growfs_data+0x691/0xe90
>  CPU: 0 PID: 573 Comm: xfs_growfs Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230420-00001-gda8c95746257
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x70
>   xfs_error_report+0x93/0xc0
>   xfs_trans_cancel+0x2c0/0x350
>   xfs_growfs_data+0x691/0xe90
>   xfs_file_ioctl+0x5f9/0x14a0
>   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x13e/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>  RIP: 0033:0x7f2d86706577
> 
> The bug can be reproduced with the following sequence:
> 
>  # truncate -s  1073741824 xfs_test.img
>  # mkfs.xfs -f -b size=1024 -d agcount=4 xfs_test.img
>  # truncate -s 2305843009213693952  xfs_test.img
>  # mount -o loop xfs_test.img /mnt/test
>  # xfs_growfs -D  1125899907891200  /mnt/test
> 
> The root cause is that during growfs, user space passed in a large value
> of newblcoks to xfs_growfs_data_private(), due to current sb_agblocks is
> too small, new AG count will exceed UINT_MAX. Because of AG number type
> is unsigned int and it would overflow, that caused nagcount much smaller
> than the actual value. During AG extent space, delta blocks in
> xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags() will much larger than the actual value due to
> incorrect nagcount, even exceed UINT_MAX. This will cause corruption and
> be detected in __xfs_free_extent. Fix it by growing the filesystem to up
> to the maximally allowed AGs and not return EINVAL when new AG count
> overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Ensure that the performance is consisent before and after the modification
>   when nagcount just overflows and 0 < nb_mod < XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS. 
> - Based on Darrick's advice, growing the filesystem to up to the maximally
>   allowed AGs when new AG count overflow.
> v4:
> - Define max ag number follow the definition in xfsprogs. 
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h |  2 ++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c     | 13 +++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> index 1cfd5bc6520a..9c60ebb328b4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
>  #define XFS_MAX_AG_BLOCKS	(XFS_MAX_AG_BYTES / XFS_MIN_BLOCKSIZE)
>  #define XFS_MAX_CRC_AG_BLOCKS	(XFS_MAX_AG_BYTES / XFS_MIN_CRC_BLOCKSIZE)
>  
> +#define XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER	((xfs_agnumber_t)(NULLAGNUMBER - 1))
> +
>  /* keep the maximum size under 2^31 by a small amount */
>  #define XFS_MAX_LOG_BYTES \
>  	((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) - XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> index 13851c0d640b..f03b6cd317a6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> @@ -115,11 +115,16 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private(
>  
>  	nb_div = nb;
>  	nb_mod = do_div(nb_div, mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks);
> -	nagcount = nb_div + (nb_mod != 0);
> -	if (nb_mod && nb_mod < XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS) {
> -		nagcount--;
> -		nb = (xfs_rfsblock_t)nagcount * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks;
> +	if (nb_mod && nb_mod >= XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)

I suspect Dave (or whoever he delegates) is going to change this to
XFS_AG_MIN_BLOCKS soon, but we'll figure out how to weave these pieces
together.

For now, this looks correct to me, so
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> +		nb_div++;
> +	else if (nb_mod)
> +		nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks;
> +
> +	if (nb_div > XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1) {
> +		nb_div = XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1;
> +		nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks;
>  	}
> +	nagcount = nb_div;
>  	delta = nb - mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks;
>  	/*
>  	 * Reject filesystems with a single AG because they are not
> -- 
> 2.31.1
>