[PATCH V2] xfs: Comment out unreachable code within xchk_fscounters()

[cem@kernel.org]

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

Comment the code out so kernel test robot stop complaining about it
every single test build.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
index e382a35e98d88..228efe0c99be8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ xchk_setup_fscounters(
 	return xchk_trans_alloc(sc, 0);
 }
 
+#if 0
 /*
  * Part 1: Collecting filesystem summary counts.  For each AG, we add its
  * summary counts (total inodes, free inodes, free data blocks) to an incore
@@ -349,6 +350,7 @@ xchk_fscount_count_frextents(
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_XFS_RT */
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Part 2: Comparing filesystem summary counters.  All we have to do here is
@@ -422,7 +424,10 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = sc->mp;
 	struct xchk_fscounters	*fsc = sc->buf;
 	int64_t			icount, ifree, fdblocks, frextents;
+
+#if 0
 	int			error;
+#endif
 
 	/* Snapshot the percpu counters. */
 	icount = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_icount);
@@ -452,6 +457,7 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 	 */
 	return 0;
 
+#if 0
 	/*
 	 * If ifree exceeds icount by more than the minimum variance then
 	 * something's probably wrong with the counters.
@@ -489,4 +495,5 @@ xchk_fscounters(
 		xchk_set_corrupt(sc);
 
 	return 0;
+#endif
 }
-- 
2.30.2