From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: abort intent items when recovery intents fail
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 07:42:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230629144236.GB11441@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629131725.945004-3-leo.lilong@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:17:24PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> When recovery intents, it may capture some deferred ops and commit the new
> intent items, if recovery intents fails, there will be no done item drop
> the reference to the new intent item. New intent items will left in AIL
> and caused mount thread hung all the time as fllows:
Er... let me try rewriting this a bit:
"When recovering intents, we capture newly created intent items as part
of committing recovered intent items. If intent recovery fails at a
later point, we forget to remove those newly created intent items from
the AIL and hang:
>
> [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/539/stack
> [<0>] xfs_ail_push_all_sync+0x174/0x230
> [<0>] xfs_unmount_flush_inodes+0x8d/0xd0
> [<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x15f7/0x1e70
> [<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x10ec/0x1b20
> [<0>] get_tree_bdev+0x3c8/0x730
> [<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2c0
> [<0>] path_mount+0xecf/0x1800
> [<0>] do_mount+0xf3/0x110
> [<0>] __x64_sys_mount+0x154/0x1f0
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> During intent item recover, if transaction that have deferred ops commmit
> fails in xfs_defer_ops_capture_and_commit(), defer capture would not added
> to capture list, so matching done items would not commit when finish defer
> operations, this will cause intent item leaks:
"Intent recovery hasn't created done items for these newly created
intent items, so the capture structure is the sole owner of the captured
intent items. We must release them explicitly or else they leak:
> unreferenced object 0xffff888016719108 (size 432):
> comm "mount", pid 529, jiffies 4294706839 (age 144.463s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 08 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff 08 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff ..q.......q.....
> 18 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff 18 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff ..q.......q.....
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff8230c68f>] xfs_efi_init+0x18f/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff8230c720>] xfs_extent_free_create_intent+0x50/0x150
> [<ffffffff821b671a>] xfs_defer_create_intents+0x16a/0x340
> [<ffffffff821bac3e>] xfs_defer_ops_capture_and_commit+0x8e/0xad0
> [<ffffffff82322bb9>] xfs_cui_item_recover+0x819/0x980
> [<ffffffff823289b6>] xlog_recover_process_intents+0x246/0xb70
> [<ffffffff8233249a>] xlog_recover_finish+0x8a/0x9a0
> [<ffffffff822eeafb>] xfs_log_mount_finish+0x2bb/0x4a0
> [<ffffffff822c0f4f>] xfs_mountfs+0x14bf/0x1e70
> [<ffffffff822d1f80>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x10d0/0x1b20
> [<ffffffff81a21fa2>] get_tree_bdev+0x3d2/0x6d0
> [<ffffffff81a1ee09>] vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2c0
> [<ffffffff81a9f35f>] path_mount+0xecf/0x1800
> [<ffffffff81a9fd83>] do_mount+0xf3/0x110
> [<ffffffff81aa00e4>] __x64_sys_mount+0x154/0x1f0
> [<ffffffff83968739>] do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
>
> Fix the problem above by abort intent items that don't have a done item
> when recovery intents fail.
>
> Fixes: e6fff81e4870 ("xfs: proper replay of deferred ops queued during log recovery")
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c | 1 +
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> index 7ec6812fa625..b2b46d142281 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ xfs_defer_ops_capture_and_commit(
> /* Commit the transaction and add the capture structure to the list. */
> error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
> if (error) {
> + xfs_defer_pending_abort(mp, &dfc->dfc_dfops);
> xfs_defer_ops_capture_free(mp, dfc);
I prefer that we not go extern'ing two functions that mess around with
internal state. Could you instead add the xfs_defer_pending_abort call
to the start of xfs_defer_ops_capture_free, and rename
xfs_defer_ops_capture_free to xfs_defer_ops_capture_abort?
Other than those two things, I /think/ this looks correct. Assuming my
understanding of the problem is reflected in the tweaks I made to the
commit message. ;)
--D
> return error;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> index 114a3a4930a3..c3775014f7ab 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct xfs_defer_pending {
> enum xfs_defer_ops_type dfp_type;
> };
>
> +void xfs_defer_pending_abort(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct list_head *dop_list);
> void xfs_defer_add(struct xfs_trans *tp, enum xfs_defer_ops_type type,
> struct list_head *h);
> int xfs_defer_finish_noroll(struct xfs_trans **tp);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index 82c81d20459d..924beecf07bb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -2511,6 +2511,7 @@ xlog_abort_defer_ops(
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(dfc, next, capture_list, dfc_list) {
> list_del_init(&dfc->dfc_list);
> + xfs_defer_pending_abort(mp, &dfc->dfc_dfops);
> xfs_defer_ops_capture_free(mp, dfc);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-29 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 13:17 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: fix two problem when recovery intents fails Long Li
2023-06-29 13:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out xfs_defer_pending_abort Long Li
2023-06-29 15:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 13:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: abort intent items when recovery intents fail Long Li
2023-06-29 14:42 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-06-30 1:51 ` Long Li
2023-06-29 13:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: make sure done item committed before cancel intents Long Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230629144236.GB11441@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox