public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8 V2] xfs: AGF length has never been bounds checked
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:35:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230629163535.GG11441@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJzn1QMNdCAXx4Il@dread.disaster.area>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:09:25PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> The AGF verifier does not check that the AGF length field is within
> known good bounds. This has never been checked by runtime kernel
> code (i.e. the lack of verification goes back to 1993) yet we assume
> in many places that it is correct and verify other metdata against
> it.
> 
> Add length verification to the AGF verifier. The length of the AGF
> must be equal to the size of the AG specified in the superblock,
> unless it is the last AG in the filesystem. In that case, it must be
> less than or equal to sb->sb_agblocks and greater than
> XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS, which is the smallest AG a growfs operation will
> allow to exist.
> 
> This requires a bit of rework of the verifier function. We want to
> verify metadata before we use it to verify other metadata. Hence
> we need to verify the AGF sequence numbers before using them to
> verify the length of the AGF. Then we can verify the AGF length
> before we verify AGFL fields. Then we can verifier other fields that
> are bounds limited by the AGF length.
> 
> And, finally, by calculating agf_length only once into a local
> variable, we can collapse repeated "if (xfs_has_foo() &&"
> conditionaly checks into single checks. This makes the code much
> easier to follow as all the checks for a given feature are obviously
> in the same place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Still looks good to me.  New question: Do we need to validate agi_length
in the AGI verifier too?

--D

> ---
> 
> Version 2:
> - growfs will write the new AGFs before the superblock has been
>   updated, so we have to skip the new runt AGF seqno check otherwise
>   it will fail.
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> index 1e72b91daff6..fe7d5ea47b90 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -2974,6 +2974,7 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = bp->b_mount;
>  	struct xfs_agf		*agf = bp->b_addr;
> +	uint32_t		agf_length = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length);
>  
>  	if (xfs_has_crc(mp)) {
>  		if (!uuid_equal(&agf->agf_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid))
> @@ -2985,18 +2986,49 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  	if (!xfs_verify_magic(bp, agf->agf_magicnum))
>  		return __this_address;
>  
> -	if (!(XFS_AGF_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_versionnum)) &&
> -	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) <= be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length) &&
> -	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) < xfs_agfl_size(mp) &&
> -	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_fllast) < xfs_agfl_size(mp) &&
> -	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount) <= xfs_agfl_size(mp)))
> +	if (!XFS_AGF_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_versionnum)))
>  		return __this_address;
>  
> -	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length) > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
> +	/*
> +	 * Both agf_seqno and agf_length need to validated before anything else
> +	 * block number related in the AGF or AGFL can be checked.
> +	 *
> +	 * During growfs operations, the perag is not fully initialised,
> +	 * so we can't use it for any useful checking. growfs ensures we can't
> +	 * use it by using uncached buffers that don't have the perag attached
> +	 * so we can detect and avoid this problem.
> +	 */
> +	if (bp->b_pag && be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != bp->b_pag->pag_agno)
> +		return __this_address;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only the last AGF in the filesytsem is allowed to be shorter
> +	 * than the AG size recorded in the superblock.
> +	 */
> +	if (agf_length != mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks) {
> +		/*
> +		 * During growfs, the new last AGF can get here before we
> +		 * have updated the superblock. Give it a pass on the seqno
> +		 * check.
> +		 */
> +		if (bp->b_pag &&
> +		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != mp->m_sb.sb_agcount - 1)
> +			return __this_address;
> +		if (agf_length < XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)
> +			return __this_address;
> +		if (agf_length > mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks)
> +			return __this_address;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) >= xfs_agfl_size(mp))
> +		return __this_address;
> +	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_fllast) >= xfs_agfl_size(mp))
> +		return __this_address;
> +	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount) > xfs_agfl_size(mp))
>  		return __this_address;
>  
>  	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) < be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_longest) ||
> -	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) > agf_length)
>  		return __this_address;
>  
>  	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_BNO]) < 1 ||
> @@ -3007,38 +3039,28 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
>  						mp->m_alloc_maxlevels)
>  		return __this_address;
>  
> -	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp) &&
> -	    (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) < 1 ||
> -	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) >
> -						mp->m_rmap_maxlevels))
> -		return __this_address;
> -
> -	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp) &&
> -	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> -		return __this_address;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * during growfs operations, the perag is not fully initialised,
> -	 * so we can't use it for any useful checking. growfs ensures we can't
> -	 * use it by using uncached buffers that don't have the perag attached
> -	 * so we can detect and avoid this problem.
> -	 */
> -	if (bp->b_pag && be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != bp->b_pag->pag_agno)
> -		return __this_address;
> -
>  	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) &&
> -	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_btreeblks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> +	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_btreeblks) > agf_length)
>  		return __this_address;
>  
> -	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp) &&
> -	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_blocks) >
> -	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
> -		return __this_address;
> +	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp)) {
> +		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks) > agf_length)
> +			return __this_address;
>  
> -	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp) &&
> -	    (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) < 1 ||
> -	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) > mp->m_refc_maxlevels))
> -		return __this_address;
> +		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) < 1 ||
> +		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) >
> +							mp->m_rmap_maxlevels)
> +			return __this_address;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp)) {
> +		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_blocks) > agf_length)
> +			return __this_address;
> +
> +		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) < 1 ||
> +		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) > mp->m_refc_maxlevels)
> +			return __this_address;
> +	}
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-29 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-27 22:44 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: various fixes for 6.5 Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: don't reverse order of items in bulk AIL insertion Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28  9:55   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-28 17:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: use deferred frees for btree block freeing Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:55     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  7:52   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: pass alloc flags through to xfs_extent_busy_flush() Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  9:44   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: allow extent free intents to be retried Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:57     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  9:50   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: don't block in busy flushing when freeing extents Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: journal geometry is not properly bounds checked Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28  6:38     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: AGF length has never been " Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29  2:09     ` [PATCH 7/8 V2] " Dave Chinner
2023-06-29 16:35       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-06-29 22:33         ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: fix bounds check in xfs_defer_agfl_block() Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 19:42 ` [RFC PATCH 9/8] xfs: AGI length should be bounds checked Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 22:35   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230629163535.GG11441@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox