From: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rm hanging, v6.1.35
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:57:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711015716.GA687252@onthe.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711001331.GA683098@onthe.net.au>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:13:31AM +1000, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 07:53:54AM +1000, Chris Dunlop wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This box is newly booted into linux v6.1.35 (2 days ago), it was
>> previously running v5.15.118 without any problems (other than that
>> fixed by "5e672cd69f0a xfs: non-blocking inodegc pushes", the reason
>> for the upgrade).
>>
>> I have rm operations on two files that have been stuck for in excess
>> of 22 hours and 18 hours respectively:
> ...
>> ...subsequent to starting writing all this down I have another two
>> sets of rms stuck, again on unremarkable files, and on two more
>> separate filesystems.
>>
>> ...oh. And an 'ls' on those files is hanging. The reboot has become
>> more urgent.
>
> FYI, it's not 'ls' that's hanging, it's bash, because I used a
> wildcard on the command line. The bash stack:
>
> $ cat /proc/24779/stack
> [<0>] iterate_dir+0x3e/0x180
> [<0>] __x64_sys_getdents64+0x71/0x100
> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80
> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
> 'lsof' shows me it's trying to read one of the directories holding the
> file that one of the newer hanging "rm"s is trying to remove.
Ugh. It wasn't just the "rm"s and bash hanging (and as it turns out,
xfs_logprint), they were just obvious because that's what I was looking
at. It turns out there was a whole lot more hanging.
Full sysrq-w output at:
https://file.io/tg7F5OqIWo1B
Sorry if there's more I could be looking at, but I've gotta reboot this
thing NOW...
Cheers,
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 21:53 rm hanging, v6.1.35 Chris Dunlop
2023-07-11 0:13 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-11 1:57 ` Chris Dunlop [this message]
2023-07-11 3:10 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-11 7:05 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-11 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-12 1:13 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-12 1:42 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-12 2:17 ` Subject: v5.15 backport - 5e672cd69f0a xfs: non-blocking inodegc pushes Chris Dunlop
2023-07-12 9:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-07-13 0:31 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-13 0:57 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-11 0:53 ` rm hanging, v6.1.35 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-11 1:13 ` Chris Dunlop
2023-07-11 2:29 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230711015716.GA687252@onthe.net.au \
--to=chris@onthe.net.au \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox