linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] check: add a -smoketest option
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:01:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230726060102.GB30264@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726000524.GG11340@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:05:24PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> 
> If someone wants that, then ok.  The taret audience for this are the
> drive-by filesystem patch authors.  IOWs, people who have some small bug
> they want to try to fix and want to run a quick test to see if their
> change works.

Zorro,

FYI, the context behind this was a comment I had made to Darrick that
the time necessary to run "-g quick" had been getting longer and
longer, and it might be nice to create a manually curated "-g smoke"
that was good enough for drive-by patch authors.  I was originally
thinking about a cut-down set of tests by selecting a subset of "-g
quick", but Darrick suggested that instead, we just run a very small
set of tests (mostly based on fsstress / fsx) and just run them in a
loop for 4 minutes or so.

We also talked about having a time budget (say, 15 minutes) and then
just dividing 15 time by the number of tests, and just run them in for
a specified soak time, so that the total time is known ahead of time.

To be honest, I was a bit dubious it could be that simple, but that's
where using kcov to show that you get a pretty good code coverage
using something that simple comes from.

> I don't think it's reasonable to expect drive-by'ers to know all that
> much about the fstests groups or spend the hours it takes to run -g all.
> As a maintainer, I prefer that these folks have done at least a small
> taste of QA before they start talking to the lists.

A big problem for the drive-by'ers is that that the top-level xfstests
README file is just plain scary, and has far too many steps for a
drive-by patch author to follow.

What I plan to add to a maintainer-entry-file.rst file for ext4 in the
kernel docs is to tell that drive-by posters that should run
"kvm-xfstests smoke" before submitting a patch, and setting up
kvm-xfstess is dead simple easy:


1)  Install kvm-xfstests --- you only have to run this once

% git clone https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld fstests
% cd fstests
% make ; make install

# Optional, if your file system you are developing isn't ext4;
# change f2fs to the file system of your choice
% echo PRIMARY_FSTYPE=f2fs >> ~/.config/kvm-xfstests


2) Build the kernel suitable for use with kvm-xfstests

% cd /path/to/your/kernel
% install-kconfig
% kbuild

3) Run the smoke test --- assuming the cwd is /path/to/your/kernel

(Note: today this runs -g quick, but it would be good if this could be
faster)

% kvm-xfstests smoke 


It's simple, and since the kvm-xfstests script will download a
pre-compiled test appliance image automatically, there's no need to
require the drive-by tester to figure out how compile xfstests with
any of its prerequisites.

And once things are set up, then it's just a matter of running
"kbuild" to build your kernel after you make changes, and running
"kvm-xfstests smoke" to do a quick smoke testing run.

No muss, no fuss, no dirty dishes...   :-)

Cheers,

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-19  1:10 [PATCHSET 0/2] fstests: testing improvements Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-19  1:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] check: add a -smoketest option Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-19 15:10   ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-19 15:29     ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-19 16:11       ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-20  2:27         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-20 14:34           ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-26  0:05             ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-26  6:01               ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2023-07-26 14:54                 ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-26 20:59                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-27  1:36                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-27  1:54                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27  3:25                     ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-27 14:33                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-27 15:30                         ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-28 15:53                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-07-19  1:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] check: generate gcov code coverage reports at the end of each section Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-19 16:19   ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-20  2:29     ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-20 14:24       ` Zorro Lang
2023-07-26  0:05         ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-26  1:56 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] fstests: testing improvements Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-26  1:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] check: add a -smoketest option Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27 19:04   ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230726060102.GB30264@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).