From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: only remap the written blocks in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:28:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231016152852.1021679-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent looks up the COW extent and the data fork
extent at offset_fsb, and then proceeds to remap the common subset
between the two.
It does however not limit the remapped extent to the passed in
[*offset_fsbm end_fsb] range and thus potentially remaps more blocks than
the one handled by the current I/O completion. This means that with
sufficiently large data and COW extents we could be remapping COW fork
mappings that have not been written to, leading to a stale data exposure
on a powerfail event.
We use to have a xfs_trim_range to make the remap fit the I/O completion
range, but that got (apparently accidentally) removed in commit
df2fd88f8ac7 ("xfs: rewrite xfs_reflink_end_cow to use intents").
Note that I've only found this by code inspection, and a test case would
probably require very specific delay and error injection.
Fixes: df2fd88f8ac7 ("xfs: rewrite xfs_reflink_end_cow to use intents")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index eb9102453affbf..0611af06771589 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -784,6 +784,7 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent(
}
}
del = got;
+ xfs_trim_extent(&del, *offset_fsb, end_fsb - *offset_fsb);
/* Grab the corresponding mapping in the data fork. */
nmaps = 1;
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-16 15:28 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-10-16 15:48 ` [PATCH] xfs: only remap the written blocks in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent Darrick J. Wong
2023-10-16 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-17 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231016152852.1021679-1-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox