From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D54136; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 05:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A04A367373; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:51:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:51:17 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Zhang Yi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Christian Brauner , "Darrick J. Wong" , Chandan Babu R , Ritesh Harjani , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] iomap: don't chain bios Message-ID: <20231127135117.GB23428@lst.de> References: <20231126124720.1249310-1-hch@lst.de> <20231126124720.1249310-10-hch@lst.de> <0f136350-3242-3e20-3b8a-56a39c66b001@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f136350-3242-3e20-3b8a-56a39c66b001@huaweicloud.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 08:53:22PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > A nice cleanup! I'm just a little curious about the writeback performance > impact of this patch. Do you have any actual test data on xfs? I've only tested the entire series, not this patch specifically. The throughput doesn't change at all in my testing, and cpu usage goes down a tiny amount, although it's probably below the measurement tolerance.