From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9496ED3 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 01:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SDYkgZvh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38008C433C8; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 01:21:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704244901; bh=mukBuDCsCUeQEy+jSeAqAb6x1VwlV6GT6pMhhnLm7uw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SDYkgZvhnVv5XJJJflFDzz78bkzdyNlY1wMeBwZvfJIY0mwumCzyrWhYEy6ZWpoDe C8m4MsQ9cCuSUjdDEXvFS+Yf3YyInZpP2mYsPKQnWlUSBSQ4UysZdZ2NAnzJIg+YLH N/J+2+A3XrySJEGoq/0Ir3gj4td2CQ1fylCmXKnVxveRw+V5q1Y6sUs8oD5RX0fdbB leLlzZjCuN7cnpiG2+3pXvBOlwViorAwLdj/mHwlk/7TedcssL6ksvt170IcxQblRT KDp9xOFkXcZfffaD+lRTmakDLA3vC1TtmlnjOS7Zs0ymIPjGXmwm85tzQ2UKuGb7Q1 0DuCkT2oXxF2w== Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 17:21:40 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: reuse xfs_bmap_update_cancel_item Message-ID: <20240103012140.GC361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <170404831410.1749708.14664484779809794342.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170404831504.1749708.16128807281068864794.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 02:45:11AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:21:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Reuse xfs_bmap_update_cancel_item to put the AG/RTG and free the item in > > a few places that currently open code the logic. > > > > Inspired-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > > Isn't this actually pretty much exactly my patch? Yeah, but with some non-trivial alterations, so that's why I went with the tagset presented here. > Either way this looks (obviously :)) good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Thanks! --D