From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D704A14 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eUqUjJ9C" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71F3BC433C7; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:52:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704250320; bh=gCFAFm/0XvOSzXM4q+kuTngf51iukrYp7pyjnIlHyUE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eUqUjJ9CP4sJr3yX5bFe14ffsqRA1SUkKwew5LqnekN5d6etWNgJfgIF+59a7Xi5Y oDAxrCIbPkybXKSkNnrN2KUVMYEsRAf6lvzdXS5KVdK9QtpCIVvDrHAHf0iem56q3Q bXt6Q5qdFFM/uDeRsyO5Ay0hAp4Q/qgx04OmQicW75WlQNxd4fHszOddT2c7q54o0i fyE+AKW7uC+cGp/2WLXjnCOq0R9QgMUehqPveewrsOFgCXdMsG8K+V20t+XDNc8kY+ kBrcucAKFLrZCca/EcLjghBrtc2f7bIc+r4xciEWA6wy5VbnTpdxBbaqGvclYDGkpt BzjwrQYrniRjA== Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:51:59 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove unnecessary fields in xfbtree_config Message-ID: <20240103025159.GN361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <170404830490.1749286.17145905891935561298.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170404830659.1749286.12453760879570391978.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 02:39:33AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 12:19:17PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Remove these fields now that we get all the info we need from the btree > > ops. > > It would be great if this series could just be moved forwared to before > adding xfbtree_config so that it wouldn't need adding in the first > place? I can look into that, but jumping this series ahead by 15 patches might be a lot of work. > Otherwise looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Thanks! --D