From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3411DFF2 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 129E768AFE; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:26:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:26:52 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chandan Babu R , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: put the xfs xfile abstraction on a diet Message-ID: <20240104062652.GF29215@lst.de> References: <20240103084126.513354-1-hch@lst.de> <20240104013502.GQ361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240104013502.GQ361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 08:41:11AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this series refactors and simplifies the code in the xfs xfile > > abstraction, which is a thing layer on a kernel-use shmem file. > > > > Do do this is needs a slighly lower level export from shmem.c, > > which I combined with improving an assert and documentation there. > > What's the base for this series? Is it xfs-linux for-next? Or > djwong-wtf? xfs-linux for-next, sorry.