From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D5181BDDB for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B1CDA68AFE; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:27:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:27:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chandan Babu R , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove the in-memory btree header block Message-ID: <20240104062725.GG29215@lst.de> References: <20240103203836.608391-1-hch@lst.de> <20240103203836.608391-2-hch@lst.de> <20240104012405.GN361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240104012405.GN361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:24:05PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Originally it was kinda nice to be able to dump the xfbtree contents > including the root pointer. That said, it really /does/ complicate > things. Doesn't any kind of dump need to talk the btree anyway?