From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: factor out a xfs_btree_owner helper
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:28:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104062805.GH29215@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104011400.GL361584@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:14:00PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > @@ -1875,25 +1874,18 @@ xfs_btree_check_block_owner(
> > struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> > struct xfs_btree_block *block)
> > {
> > - if (!xfs_has_crc(cur->bc_mp))
> > + if (!xfs_has_crc(cur->bc_mp) ||
>
> I wonder, shouldn't this be (bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_CRC_BLOCKS) and not
> xfs_has_crc? They're one and the same, but as the geometry flags are
> all getting moved to xfs_btree_ops, we ought to be consistent about what
> we check.
Sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 20:38 RFC: in-memory btree simplifications Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-03 20:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove the in-memory btree header block Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 1:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-03 20:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove struct xfboff_bitmap Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-03 20:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: remove bc_ino.flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 1:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-03 20:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: factor out a xfs_btree_owner helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 1:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-01-03 20:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: embedd struct xfbtree into the owning structure Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 1:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 7:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-04 7:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-05 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104062805.GH29215@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).