From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB14286AF for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IyFPHd7z" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D42FC433C8; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704389108; bh=nwnDiXO82C9pR7YZQyvCYE6Jwr88yWk96exyJXsYXXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IyFPHd7zAlgYsonQFV1ZzM0mnxxYw6Ruby49GqkufQOFJrrKYnnsZcnPbcjx15ptG ZaBtzu3O3xTPd3pJTECYRT+pArmInxR+/fBvonWzTzSxOrDIE3phT75mCNfWdtiVxa bxgeRgMUJ0ML9pAvIzVuGgeyqyY7Un0ex9Jb22hO/7ukPRmcjVPzk9G9inZ5X4f4tC 2hKwuJOqpb8GlEsqFFV8qAXt6Q8F9wywrAnJkFX4XgZ/jVs3DOFEXmXHON4HHkz2tg X++kw8LpZjW32bzUcy9ARHRgp6EKiGm3ydPrELYCfGw1vMMpLTvQpI2bXatS1gFLEP mCplw2u4IpUEQ== Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:25:07 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Chandan Babu R , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove the in-memory btree header block Message-ID: <20240104172507.GG361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20240103203836.608391-1-hch@lst.de> <20240103203836.608391-2-hch@lst.de> <20240104012405.GN361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240104062725.GG29215@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240104062725.GG29215@lst.de> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:27:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:24:05PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Originally it was kinda nice to be able to dump the xfbtree contents > > including the root pointer. That said, it really /does/ complicate > > things. > > Doesn't any kind of dump need to talk the btree anyway? Not if you're willing to stare at the output from xfile_dump() ;) --D