From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE2B28DA9 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VlKa8l+v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83C02C433C8; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704391162; bh=m3IEAzJoi9nPMhidUIqWN0JNs9K7Kt2G+nBXQPdMklE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VlKa8l+vxqh4Rq5Pn3JdQb2fTjmdL07v3UQ+UbGJ50kS3Q88BYEINamPoJo8G6VRh U3g8PmwURcwfcks1/QW+qfXKffqeIJL9vw7cGcyfERSTeqyZFsLCSeQRWoMoHq4eU0 6Wo924sg1WLXCjMV7niIn7Yu7+gXHcbKpdgTMxlg7o0wNkxO7Xbx1SGq81h0VAy6Rj KMXtr7jRbTKrgbNVrQs3dHJ2envMAwIKyr7+v71mBX7cxi/ArZMg9uYKIDqZyinikx Y8tBGIAxTTV1VuLOTyatdCArwDqSQNuXfiDiLMwXq3CrBA369ZXQrS7hirtMi/HH9R r2olP9ZFa6W/w== Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:59:21 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfile: implement write caching Message-ID: <20240104175921.GH361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <170404837590.1754104.3601847870577015044.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170404837645.1754104.3271871045806193458.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240104013356.GP361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240104072050.GA361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240104073412.GF361584@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:39:58PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:34:12PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Ok, I'll do that. Were you planning to send that first series to > > Chandan for 6.8? > > If you're fine with that and I get reviews from Hugh for the small shmem > bits I'd like to get it included ASAP. Ok by me, though I also would like to hear from Hugh that the shmem.c modifications make sense. --D