From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Jian Wen <wenjianhn@gmail.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Jian Wen <wenjian1@xiaomi.com>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Jian Wen <wenjianhn@gmail.com>, <djwong@kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>,
<dchinner@redhat.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:08:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104062248.3245102-1-wenjian1@xiaomi.com>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.generic.603.fail" on:
commit: 7616836bd77299614d6ff314f6fd6c65b433f56a ("[PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jian-Wen/xfs-improve-handling-of-prjquot-ENOSPC/20240104-142759
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240104062248.3245102-1-wenjian1@xiaomi.com/
patch subject: [PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC
in testcase: xfstests
version: xfstests-x86_64-f814a0d8-1_20231225
with following parameters:
disk: 4HDD
fs: xfs
test: generic-603
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (Skylake) with 32G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com
2024-01-09 17:34:02 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sda1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sda1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export FSTYP=xfs
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
2024-01-09 17:34:03 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda4
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_LOGDEV=/dev/sda2
meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=13107200 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
= reflink=1 bigtime=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=52428800, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=25600, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export MKFS_OPTIONS=-mreflink=1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 echo generic/603
2024-01-09 17:34:04 ./check generic/603
FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-skl-d03 6.7.0-rc4-00137-g7616836bd772 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Jan 8 09:32:19 CST 2024
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -mreflink=1 /dev/sda4
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /fs/scratch
generic/603 - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/603.out 2023-12-25 18:24:02.000000000 +0000
+++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad 2024-01-09 17:37:42.162919905 +0000
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
Write 225 blocks...
Rewrite 250 blocks plus 1 byte, over the block softlimit...
Try to write 1 one more block after grace...
-pwrite: Disk quota exceeded
+pwrite: No space left on device
--- Test inode quota ---
Create 2 more files, over the inode softlimit...
...
(Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/generic/603.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/603
Failures: generic/603
Failed 1 of 1 tests
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240110/202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 15:07 [PATCH] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC Jian Wen
2023-12-14 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-14 21:13 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-16 15:49 ` Jian Wen
2023-12-16 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Jian Wen
2023-12-18 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-19 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 13:50 ` Jian Wen
2023-12-23 11:00 ` Jian Wen
2024-01-04 6:22 ` [PATCH v4] " Jian Wen
2024-01-08 0:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-09 6:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-09 6:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-11 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-11 7:24 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-10 14:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-23 10:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Jian Wen
2024-01-03 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-03 3:45 ` Jian Wen
2024-01-04 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 3:36 ` Jian Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wenjian1@xiaomi.com \
--cc=wenjianhn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).