From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_db: use directio for device access
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:52:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240119005204.GF674522@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZainRaV+P0qr1o6g@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 08:21:25PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:32:50PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > >
> > > For xfs/002 that is the libxfs_buf_read in __set_cur, when setting the
> > > type to data, but I haven't looked at the other test in detail.
> >
> > Hmm. Perhaps the userspace buftarg setup should go find the physical
> > sector size of the device? That "bb_count = 1" in set_iocur_type looks
> > a bit smelly.
>
> Yes, that should fix this particular issue.
>
> > > Should I look into finding all these assumptions in xfs_db, or
> > > just make the direct I/O enablement conditional n a 612 byte sector
> > > size?
> >
> > Let me go run a lbasize=4k fstests run overnight and see what happens.
> > IIRC zorro told me last year that it wasn't pretty.
>
> There's a few failures, but I've been slowly trying to fix this. The
> libxfs/mkfs log sector size detection series in one part of that,
> and this:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20240117175901.871796-1-hch@lst.de/T/#u
Hmm well I didn't manage to add your loop device patch before I sent
this out last night, but here's the fstest results:
https://djwong.org/fstests/output/.67c2f90f0a1bb329a1b895c50285b0d23c1bd2bb44b7839f3543f82281665db1/.4a10533d4dd2085d3f996649e0886284f557617c94e604189448672e6009b9e8/
Looks like there were a lot of weird problems. OFC now the second ice
storm has started and the lights are flickering so that might be all
from me for now.
--D
> is another
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <KT7JxvGZnq9-QNN8kBpbKekDJ2BKLQOGCjpSETPSGhPryNhXo_L71VZTCaXaI2AY3cjBINdJO97ZbUCOOYZSeg==@protonmail.internalid>
2023-09-25 21:59 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] xfs_db: use directio for filesystem access Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-25 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] libxfs: make platform_set_blocksize optional with directio Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-25 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs_db: use directio for device access Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-17 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-18 1:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-18 4:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-19 0:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2023-10-03 11:47 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] xfs_db: use directio for filesystem access Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240119005204.GF674522@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox