From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: zlang@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: p.raghav@samsung.com, djwong@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfs/558: scale blk IO size based on the filesystem blksz
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:17:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122111751.449762-2-kernel@pankajraghav.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122111751.449762-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
This test fails for >= 64k filesystem block size on a 4k PAGE_SIZE
system(see LBS efforts[1]). Scale the `blksz` based on the filesystem
block size instead of fixing it as 64k so that we do get some iomap
invalidations while doing concurrent writes.
Cap the blksz to be at least 64k to retain the same behaviour as before
for smaller filesystem blocksizes.
[1] LBS effort: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230915183848.1018717-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com/
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
tests/xfs/558 | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/558 b/tests/xfs/558
index 9e9b3be8..270f458c 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/558
+++ b/tests/xfs/558
@@ -127,7 +127,12 @@ _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
$XFS_IO_PROG -c 'chattr -x' $SCRATCH_MNT &> $seqres.full
_require_pagecache_access $SCRATCH_MNT
-blksz=65536
+min_blksz=65536
+file_blksz=$(_get_file_block_size "$SCRATCH_MNT")
+blksz=$(( 8 * $file_blksz ))
+
+blksz=$(( blksz > min_blksz ? blksz : min_blksz ))
+
_require_congruent_file_oplen $SCRATCH_MNT $blksz
# Make sure we have sufficient extent size to create speculative CoW
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 11:17 [PATCH 0/2] fstest changes for LBS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-22 11:17 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2024-01-22 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs/558: scale blk IO size based on the filesystem blksz Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-22 17:23 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-13 20:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-22 11:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs/161: adapt the test case for LBS filesystem Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-01-22 16:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-22 17:32 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-25 16:06 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-23 0:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] fstest changes for LBS Dave Chinner
2024-01-23 8:52 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-23 13:43 ` Zorro Lang
2024-01-23 15:39 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-01-23 16:33 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-23 15:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-01-23 16:40 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-23 19:42 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-01-23 20:21 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-01-24 16:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-24 21:06 ` Pankaj Raghav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122111751.449762-2-kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox