From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F67148309 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706892251; cv=none; b=FIZ/w5Vl7UO/a/Hlupqhzz4uzSFJb6/w+PD02WsPsNdV5x0V437GjGXjNcti0R71LE868jG/70braBtxEgH34P/Pz8Ri/eHqFYbbrik6vbmmtxFmzq8UraeKe+iDfvih+/lF1/36ykECWHsdSbzgRGppBOIx6Wl3cuYx8pnloCs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706892251; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uUzOoGiERZ7mGeuggiTyL0+KnvGqCFboKmKedY0kEZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZM8tYPzZo22Rn/42uQx1WIIAeliGnnjSH0c96trVhIryM6x8Tue8tKfbJN0GMemHGsrx1TJEyCdoboXA4kKdL+uLG+EmjQoThMf8XFlsbb/QkNjPpbw8TuizI4WPpv11wq7xiGofont5iJfyPtC0DJxnl6lb6RKYGaiDumwZoOw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SgskXtVo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SgskXtVo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B021BC433C7; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:44:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706892250; bh=uUzOoGiERZ7mGeuggiTyL0+KnvGqCFboKmKedY0kEZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SgskXtVocZ1TkCDqWC85h/tTEjlCHj574jxR9WgKzX9+CTOtKCRwpFBecRj/pTNIq YzZmvEAp6AhuRXckdV9nI8wgLC2YIOZ6VL/+ESTsrt7MQPmBR86YJrX7/vfyHKElSo uuWrgOY8B9e7jU3B79ipvOJgN5mEmA0t+sJbqbFqF36DpSoQc6eS3mDn0SCw2Wni2i z0KbybcLW+lQ1gipIzwXDKSdv9djRx0PfA9I4qfq6VopnO7w0cELEHaDUz5GMiW2k7 jnnBXVZC1833V5vLlGVxvyZ0PSHJNtJkEvy/yOn+TR31g4zPczi04hSAl6GbTLOQEL UnBojjQWGKyog== Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 08:44:10 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Sam James Cc: carlos@maiolino.me, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs: for-next updated to 3ec53d438 Message-ID: <20240202164410.GJ616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <87ttn3jawv.fsf@gentoo.org> <87jznncqo2.fsf@gentoo.org> <875xz7cqg9.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875xz7cqg9.fsf@gentoo.org> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 06:47:26AM +0000, Sam James wrote: > > Sam James writes: > > > Sam James writes: > > > >> I think > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240122072351.3036242-1-sam@gentoo.org/ > >> is ready. > >> > >> See Christoph's comment wrt application order: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Za4Yso9cEs+TzU8w@infradead.org/. > >> > > > > Ping - I think it missed another push too. Please let me know if I > > need to be doing something different. > > (Oh wait, maybe the other one was a non-progs push.) Huh? The off64_t -> off_t conversion and the TIME_BITS=64 changes are both xfsprogs. Carlos hasn't merged either of those into for-next. I'm not sure if he's just going to release 6.6 as-is and move on to 6.7, or what. --D > > > >> thanks, > >> sam > >