From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B237133F7; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708533238; cv=none; b=qcrTm1r5s+Psjh+sXu0cKFbHRn2rNf3UCaB/A19WwVaLWTmQQhMWJ3H63/BnF4YDiF8Mj5557+4P5Y9oyksUiSnSXmtQxyA0xXbjNtXEsikBjuZqWbWf4KZ4rieUjulVzCaEcfAI3oi8SbWfcrEU0bQPQ4D+5aAXPxaH2ZU9784= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708533238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K8TkU8VEGRGPpgxmWotAHrzxJL9B4kDIQylUeado+as=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VoLLJ3S0kRclB/Mod6Wo6z9oSRWHUReQt5PMIRl1CcLur4cdl4uw72pJKLnjkqG5/EmwmTqx2e8CRKxX2BVR0wDJm6gtmDaHMmyP+KLDQ49aKDhF+OyVlQwTBiWiQyPoqKvMjsjSzb59ik9N6bxIBeYCuBDK1+kauMO0Sjw2jYc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4E3EA68B05; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:25:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:25:15 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , zlang@kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/449: don't run with RT devices Message-ID: <20240221162515.GA25439@lst.de> References: <20240221063524.3562890-1-hch@lst.de> <20240221155338.GF616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240221155338.GF616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 07:53:38AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Odd... this test only takes ~50s on my rt testing rig. > > _scratch_mkfs_sized should restrict the size of both the data device and > the rt volume to 256M, right? Looking at tot, it sets "-d size=$fssize" > and "-r size=$fssize", so I don't think I understand what's going on > here. You are right. I have some local patches that messed things up and increased the data device size based on paramters of the RT device in _scratch_mkfs_sized. I've fixed this up now.