From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:52:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223165252.GP616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223071506.3968029-4-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:14:59AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> And to make that more clear, rearrange the code a bit and add asserts
> and a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
I /think/ I grok this... :)
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> index 12d45e93f07d50..befb508638ca1f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> @@ -594,28 +594,38 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> bool rsvd = (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_RESERVE) != 0;
> - int64_t blkdelta = 0;
> - int64_t rtxdelta = 0;
> + int64_t blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
> + int64_t rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
> int64_t idelta = 0;
> int64_t ifreedelta = 0;
> int error;
>
> - /* calculate deltas */
> - if (tp->t_blk_res > 0)
> - blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
> - if ((tp->t_fdblocks_delta != 0) &&
> - (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
> - (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)))
> + /*
> + * Calculate the deltas.
> + *
> + * t_fdblocks_delta and t_frextents_delta can be positive or negative:
> + *
> + * - positive values indicate blocks freed in the transaction.
> + * - negative values indicate blocks allocated in the transaction
> + *
> + * Negative values can only happen if the transaction has a block
> + * reservation that covers the allocated block. The end result is
> + * that the calculated delta values must always be positive and we
> + * can only put back previous allocated or reserved blocks here.
> + */
> + ASSERT(tp->t_blk_res || tp->t_fdblocks_delta >= 0);
> + if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
> blkdelta += tp->t_fdblocks_delta;
> + ASSERT(blkdelta >= 0);
> + }
>
> - if (tp->t_rtx_res > 0)
> - rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
> - if ((tp->t_frextents_delta != 0) &&
> - (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY))
> + ASSERT(tp->t_rtx_res || tp->t_frextents_delta >= 0);
> + if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY) {
> rtxdelta += tp->t_frextents_delta;
> + ASSERT(rtxdelta >= 0);
> + }
>
> - if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
> - (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
> + if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
> idelta = tp->t_icount_delta;
> ifreedelta = tp->t_ifree_delta;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 7:14 bring back RT delalloc support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-26 10:04 bring back RT delalloc support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 10:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223165252.GP616564@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox