public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:13:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223171324.GS616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223071506.3968029-7-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:15:02AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The code to account fdblocks and frextents in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay
> is a bit weird in that it accounts frextents before the iext tree
> manipulations and fdblocks after it.  Given that the iext tree
> manipulations can fail currently that's not really a problem, but

                cannot?

If my correction ^^^ is correct, then:
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> still odd.  Move the frextent manipulation to the end, and use a
> fdblocks variable to account of the unconditional indirect blocks and
> the data blocks only freed for !RT.  This prepares for following
> updates in the area and already makes the code more readable.
> 
> Also remove the !isrt assert given that this code clearly handles
> rt extents correctly, and we'll soon reinstate delalloc support for
> RT inodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 95e93534cd1264..074d833e845af3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4833,6 +4833,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		del_endoff, got_endoff;
>  	xfs_filblks_t		got_indlen, new_indlen, stolen;
>  	uint32_t		state = xfs_bmap_fork_to_state(whichfork);
> +	uint64_t		fdblocks;
>  	int			error = 0;
>  	bool			isrt;
>  
> @@ -4848,15 +4849,11 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
>  	ASSERT(got->br_startoff <= del->br_startoff);
>  	ASSERT(got_endoff >= del_endoff);
>  
> -	if (isrt)
> -		xfs_add_frextents(mp, xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del->br_blockcount));
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Update the inode delalloc counter now and wait to update the
>  	 * sb counters as we might have to borrow some blocks for the
>  	 * indirect block accounting.
>  	 */
> -	ASSERT(!isrt);
>  	error = xfs_quota_unreserve_blkres(ip, del->br_blockcount);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> @@ -4933,12 +4930,15 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
>  
>  	ASSERT(da_old >= da_new);
>  	da_diff = da_old - da_new;
> -	if (!isrt)
> -		da_diff += del->br_blockcount;
> -	if (da_diff) {
> -		xfs_add_fdblocks(mp, da_diff);
> -		xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, -da_diff);
> -	}
> +	fdblocks = da_diff;
> +
> +	if (isrt)
> +		xfs_add_frextents(mp, xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, del->br_blockcount));
> +	else
> +		fdblocks += del->br_blockcount;
> +
> +	xfs_add_fdblocks(mp, fdblocks);
> +	xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, -(int64_t)fdblocks);
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  7:14 bring back RT delalloc support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:30           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:13   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-02-23 17:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:30         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-26 10:04 bring back RT delalloc support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 10:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240223171324.GS616564@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox