From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:20:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223172028.GT616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223071506.3968029-8-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:15:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To prepare for re-enabling delalloc on RT devices, track the data blocks
> (which use the RT device when the inode sits on it) and the indirect
> blocks (which don't) separately to xfs_mod_delalloc, and add a new
> percpu counter to also track the RT delalloc blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c | 3 +++
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 074d833e845af3..d7fda286a4eaa0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real(
> }
>
> if (da_new != da_old)
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, (int64_t)da_new - da_old);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(bma->ip, 0, (int64_t)da_new - da_old);
>
> if (bma->cur) {
> da_new += bma->cur->bc_ino.allocated;
> @@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_delay(
> /*
> * Nothing to do for disk quota accounting here.
> */
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(ip->i_mount, (int64_t)newlen - oldlen);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(ip, 0, (int64_t)newlen - oldlen);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ xfs_bmap_alloc_account(
> * yet.
> */
> if (ap->wasdel) {
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(ap->ip->i_mount, -(int64_t)ap->length);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(ap->ip, -(int64_t)ap->length, 0);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -3316,7 +3316,7 @@ xfs_bmap_alloc_account(
> xfs_trans_log_inode(ap->tp, ap->ip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
> if (ap->wasdel) {
> ap->ip->i_delayed_blks -= ap->length;
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(ap->ip->i_mount, -(int64_t)ap->length);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(ap->ip, -(int64_t)ap->length, 0);
> fld = isrt ? XFS_TRANS_DQ_DELRTBCOUNT : XFS_TRANS_DQ_DELBCOUNT;
> } else {
> fld = isrt ? XFS_TRANS_DQ_RTBCOUNT : XFS_TRANS_DQ_BCOUNT;
> @@ -4041,7 +4041,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc(
> goto out_unreserve_frextents;
>
> ip->i_delayed_blks += alen;
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(ip->i_mount, alen + indlen);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(ip, alen, indlen);
>
> got->br_startoff = aoff;
> got->br_startblock = nullstartblock(indlen);
> @@ -4938,7 +4938,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
> fdblocks += del->br_blockcount;
>
> xfs_add_fdblocks(mp, fdblocks);
> - xfs_mod_delalloc(mp, -(int64_t)fdblocks);
> + xfs_mod_delalloc(ip, -(int64_t)del->br_blockcount, -da_diff);
> return error;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
> index 5c6d7244078942..b442e50e81555f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
> @@ -426,6 +426,9 @@ xchk_fscount_count_frextents(
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + fsc->frextents -=
> + xfs_rtb_to_rtx(mp, percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks));
Should m_delalloc_rtblks be measured in rt extents (and not fsblocks)
since a sub-rtx delalloc doesn't make any sense? As written, here we'd
also have to signal a corruption if (m_delalloc_rtblks % rextsize > 0).
--D
> +
> out_unlock:
> xfs_iunlock(sc->mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP);
> return error;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 2e06837051d6b0..afc30d3333e8ad 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -1388,9 +1388,19 @@ xfs_clear_incompat_log_features(
> #define XFS_DELALLOC_BATCH (4096)
> void
> xfs_mod_delalloc(
> - struct xfs_mount *mp,
> - int64_t delta)
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + int64_t data_delta,
> + int64_t ind_delta)
> {
> - percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_delalloc_blks, delta,
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> +
> + if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
> + percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks, data_delta,
> + XFS_DELALLOC_BATCH);
> + if (!ind_delta)
> + return;
> + data_delta = 0;
> + }
> + percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_delalloc_blks, data_delta + ind_delta,
> XFS_DELALLOC_BATCH);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index 891a54d57f576d..71c7d06f3210c8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
> * extents or anything related to the rt device.
> */
> struct percpu_counter m_delalloc_blks;
> +
> + /*
> + * RT version of the above.
> + */
> + struct percpu_counter m_delalloc_rtblks;
> +
> /*
> * Global count of allocation btree blocks in use across all AGs. Only
> * used when perag reservation is enabled. Helps prevent block
> @@ -586,6 +592,7 @@ struct xfs_error_cfg * xfs_error_get_cfg(struct xfs_mount *mp,
> void xfs_force_summary_recalc(struct xfs_mount *mp);
> int xfs_add_incompat_log_feature(struct xfs_mount *mp, uint32_t feature);
> bool xfs_clear_incompat_log_features(struct xfs_mount *mp);
> -void xfs_mod_delalloc(struct xfs_mount *mp, int64_t delta);
> +void xfs_mod_delalloc(struct xfs_inode *ip, int64_t data_delta,
> + int64_t ind_delta);
>
> #endif /* __XFS_MOUNT_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index b16828410ec19b..1e21f8b953cf77 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1053,12 +1053,18 @@ xfs_init_percpu_counters(
> if (error)
> goto free_fdblocks;
>
> - error = percpu_counter_init(&mp->m_frextents, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + error = percpu_counter_init(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (error)
> goto free_delalloc;
>
> + error = percpu_counter_init(&mp->m_frextents, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (error)
> + goto free_delalloc_rt;
> +
> return 0;
>
> +free_delalloc_rt:
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks);
> free_delalloc:
> percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_delalloc_blks);
> free_fdblocks:
> @@ -1087,6 +1093,9 @@ xfs_destroy_percpu_counters(
> percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_icount);
> percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_ifree);
> percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_fdblocks);
> + ASSERT(xfs_is_shutdown(mp) ||
> + percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks) == 0);
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_delalloc_rtblks);
> ASSERT(xfs_is_shutdown(mp) ||
> percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_delalloc_blks) == 0);
> percpu_counter_destroy(&mp->m_delalloc_blks);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 7:14 bring back RT delalloc support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-02-23 17:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 7:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-26 10:04 bring back RT delalloc support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 10:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 17:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240223172028.GT616564@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox