public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:26:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223172646.GW616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223071506.3968029-11-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:15:06AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Commit aff3a9edb708 ("xfs: Use preallocation for inodes with extsz
> hints") disabled delayed allocation for all inodes with extent size
> hints due a data exposure problem.  It turns out we fixed this data
> exposure problem since by always creating unwritten extents for
> delalloc conversions due to more data exposure problems, but the
> writeback path doesn't actually support extent size hints when
> converting delalloc these days, which probably isn't a problem given
> that people using the hints know what they get.
> 
> However due to the way how xfs_get_extsz_hint is implemented, it
> always claims an extent size hint for RT inodes even if the RT
> extent size is a single FSB.  Due to that the above commit effectively
> disabled delalloc support for RT inodes.
> 
> Switch xfs_get_extsz_hint to return 0 for this case and work around
> that in a few places to reinstate delalloc support for RT inodes on
> file systems with an sb_rextsize of 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Woot!
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c   | 3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c   | 2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c    | 2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 2 ++
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 37ec247edc1332..9e12278d1b62cd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ xfs_get_extsz_hint(
>  		return 0;
>  	if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE) && ip->i_extsize)
>  		return ip->i_extsize;
> -	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))
> +	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) &&
> +	    ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_rextsize > 1)
>  		return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index e6abe56d1f1f23..aea4e29ebd6785 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -992,8 +992,6 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  		return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
>  				flags, iomap, srcmap);
>  
> -	ASSERT(!XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip));
> -
>  	error = xfs_qm_dqattach(ip);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index be102fd49560dc..ca60ba060fd5c9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ xfs_stat_blksize(
>  	 * always return the realtime extent size.
>  	 */
>  	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))
> -		return XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip));
> +		return XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip) ? : 1);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allow large block sizes to be reported to userspace programs if the
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> index 2f85567f3d756b..9c7fba175b9025 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> @@ -1340,6 +1340,8 @@ xfs_bmap_rtalloc(
>  	int			error;
>  
>  	align = xfs_get_extsz_hint(ap->ip);
> +	if (!align)
> +		align = 1;
>  retry:
>  	error = xfs_bmap_extsize_align(mp, &ap->got, &ap->prev,
>  					align, 1, ap->eof, 0,
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  7:14 bring back RT delalloc support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:30           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:30         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:26   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-26 10:04 bring back RT delalloc support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 10:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240223172646.GW616564@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox