public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:31:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240312223131.GA8115@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfDTZpuumZSn6oPp@kbusch-mbp.mynextlight.net>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 04:12:54PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +	if (!nr_sects)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > +	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	if (start + len > bdev_nr_bytes(bdev))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Maybe you want to shift lower bytes out of consideration, but it is
> different, right? For example, if I call this ioctl with start=5 and
> len=555, it would return EINVAL, but your change would let it succeed
> the same as if start=0, len=512.

We did the same before, just down in __blkdev_issue_discard instead of
in the ioctl handler.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12 14:45 RFCv2: fix fatal signal handling in __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-12 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-12 22:12   ` Keith Busch
2024-03-12 22:31     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-03-13  1:22       ` Keith Busch
2024-03-13 15:40   ` Keith Busch
2024-03-13 20:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-13 20:08       ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-12 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: add a bio_chain_and_submit helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-12 14:51   ` Keith Busch
2024-03-12 21:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-12 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: add a blk_alloc_discard_bio helper Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-12 14:48 RFCv2: fix fatal signal handling in __blkdev_issue_discard Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-12 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240312223131.GA8115@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox