public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: rename bp->b_folio_count
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:46:00 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240318224715.3367463-10-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240318224715.3367463-1-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

The count is used purely to allocate the correct number of bvecs for
submitting IO. Rename it to b_bvec_count.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c     | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h     |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 6d6bad80722e..2a6796c48454 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -69,15 +69,14 @@ static inline bool xfs_buf_is_uncached(struct xfs_buf *bp)
 /*
  * Return true if the buffer is vmapped.
  *
- * b_addr is null if the buffer is not mapped, but the code is clever enough to
- * know it doesn't have to map a single folio, so the check has to be both for
- * b_addr and bp->b_folio_count > 1.
+ * b_addr is always set, so we have to look at bp->b_bvec_count to determine if
+ * the buffer was vmalloc()d or not.
  */
 static inline int
 xfs_buf_is_vmapped(
 	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
 {
-	return bp->b_addr && bp->b_folio_count > 1;
+	return bp->b_bvec_count > 1;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -88,7 +87,7 @@ static inline int
 xfs_buf_vmap_len(
 	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
 {
-	return (bp->b_folio_count * PAGE_SIZE);
+	return (bp->b_bvec_count * PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -306,7 +305,7 @@ xfs_buf_free(
 	}
 
 	if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_KMEM))
-		mm_account_reclaimed_pages(bp->b_folio_count);
+		mm_account_reclaimed_pages(bp->b_bvec_count);
 
 	if (bp->b_flags & _XBF_FOLIOS)
 		__folio_put(kmem_to_folio(bp->b_addr));
@@ -342,7 +341,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_kmem(
 		bp->b_addr = NULL;
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	bp->b_folio_count = 1;
+	bp->b_bvec_count = 1;
 	bp->b_flags |= _XBF_KMEM;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -370,7 +369,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_folio(
 		return false;
 
 	bp->b_addr = folio_address(folio);
-	bp->b_folio_count = 1;
+	bp->b_bvec_count = 1;
 	bp->b_flags |= _XBF_FOLIOS;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -398,6 +397,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_folios(
 {
 	gfp_t		gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP | __GFP_NOWARN;
 	unsigned	nofs_flag;
+	unsigned int	count;
 
 	if (flags & XBF_READ_AHEAD)
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
@@ -407,16 +407,24 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_folios(
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO;
 
 	/* Fall back to allocating an array of single page folios. */
-	bp->b_folio_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(BBTOB(bp->b_length), PAGE_SIZE);
+	count = DIV_ROUND_UP(BBTOB(bp->b_length), PAGE_SIZE);
 
 	/* Optimistically attempt a single high order folio allocation. */
 	if (xfs_buf_alloc_folio(bp, gfp_mask))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* We are done if an order-0 allocation has already failed. */
-	if (bp->b_folio_count == 1)
+	if (count == 1)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	/*
+	 * Largest buffer we allocate should fit entirely in a single bio,
+	 * so warn and fail if somebody asks for a buffer larger than can
+	 * be supported.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count > BIO_MAX_VECS))
+		return -EIO;
+
 	/*
 	 * XXX(dgc): I think dquot reclaim is the only place we can get
 	 * to this function from memory reclaim context now. If we fix
@@ -430,9 +438,10 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_folios(
 	if (!bp->b_addr) {
 		xfs_warn_ratelimited(bp->b_mount,
 			"%s: failed to allocate %u folios", __func__,
-			bp->b_folio_count);
+			count);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
+	bp->b_bvec_count = count;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1483,14 +1492,9 @@ xfs_buf_ioapply_map(
 	size = min_t(unsigned int, BBTOB(bp->b_maps[map].bm_len),
 			BBTOB(bp->b_length) - *buf_offset);
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bp->b_folio_count > BIO_MAX_VECS)) {
-		xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	atomic_inc(&bp->b_io_remaining);
 
-	bio = bio_alloc(bp->b_target->bt_bdev, bp->b_folio_count, op, GFP_NOIO);
+	bio = bio_alloc(bp->b_target->bt_bdev, bp->b_bvec_count, op, GFP_NOIO);
 	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bp->b_maps[map].bm_bn;
 	bio->bi_end_io = xfs_buf_bio_end_io;
 	bio->bi_private = bp;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
index 68c24947ca1a..32688525890b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct xfs_buf {
 	int			b_map_count;
 	atomic_t		b_pin_count;	/* pin count */
 	atomic_t		b_io_remaining;	/* #outstanding I/O requests */
-	unsigned int		b_folio_count;	/* size of folio array */
+	unsigned int		b_bvec_count;	/* bvecs needed for IO */
 	int			b_error;	/* error code on I/O */
 
 	/*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
index 336e7c8effb7..30d53ddd6e69 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ xmbuf_map_folio(
 	unlock_page(page);
 
 	bp->b_addr = page_address(page);
-	bp->b_folio_count = 1;
+	bp->b_bvec_count = 1;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ xmbuf_unmap_folio(
 
 	folio_put(kmem_to_folio(bp->b_addr));
 	bp->b_addr = NULL;
-	bp->b_folio_count = 0;
+	bp->b_bvec_count = 0;
 }
 
 /* Is this a valid daddr within the buftarg? */
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18 22:45 [PATCH v2 0/9] xfs: use large folios for buffers Dave Chinner
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: unmapped buffer item size straddling mismatch Dave Chinner
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: use folios in the buffer cache Dave Chinner
2024-03-19  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19  6:52     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-19  6:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 21:42     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 21:42     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 17:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Dave Chinner
2024-03-19  6:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 17:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 21:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 21:38       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 21:41         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 22:23           ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-21  2:12           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-21  2:40             ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-21 21:28               ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-21 21:39                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-21 22:02                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 21:55     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-22  8:02   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-22 22:04     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-25 11:17       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: kill XBF_UNMAPPED Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 17:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 23:36     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: buffer items don't straddle pages anymore Dave Chinner
2024-03-19  6:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 17:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: map buffers in xfs_buf_alloc_folios Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 17:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 21:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 21:39       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 21:41         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: walk b_addr for buffer I/O Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 17:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 21:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-18 22:45 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: use vmalloc for multi-folio buffers Dave Chinner
2024-03-19 17:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-20  0:20     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-18 22:46 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-03-19  7:37   ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: rename bp->b_folio_count Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19 23:59     ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-19  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] xfs: use large folios for buffers Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19  0:44   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240318224715.3367463-10-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox