public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] iomap: make iomap_write_end() return a boolean
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:08:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240319210805.GM1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240319011102.2929635-9-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:11:01AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> 
> For now, we can make sure iomap_write_end() always return 0 or copied
> bytes, so instead of return written bytes, convert to return a boolean
> to indicate the copied bytes have been written to the pagecache.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 291648c61a32..004673ea8bc1 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> -static size_t __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
> +static bool __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
>  		size_t copied, struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	flush_dcache_folio(folio);
> @@ -807,14 +807,14 @@ static size_t __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
>  	 * redo the whole thing.
>  	 */
>  	if (unlikely(copied < len && !folio_test_uptodate(folio)))
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  	iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), len);
>  	iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), copied);
>  	filemap_dirty_folio(inode->i_mapping, folio);
> -	return copied;
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static size_t iomap_write_end_inline(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> +static void iomap_write_end_inline(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>  		struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, size_t copied)
>  {
>  	const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
> @@ -829,21 +829,32 @@ static size_t iomap_write_end_inline(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
>  	kunmap_local(addr);
>  
>  	mark_inode_dirty(iter->inode);
> -	return copied;
>  }
>  
> -/* Returns the number of bytes copied.  May be 0.  Cannot be an errno. */
> -static size_t iomap_write_end(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t len,
> +/*
> + * Returns true if all copied bytes have been written to the pagecache,
> + * otherwise return false.
> + */
> +static bool iomap_write_end(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t len,
>  		size_t copied, struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> +	bool ret = true;
>  
> -	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE)
> -		return iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied);
> -	if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD)
> -		return block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos, len,
> -				       copied, &folio->page, NULL);
> -	return __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio);
> +	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) {
> +		iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied);
> +	} else if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) {
> +		size_t bh_written;
> +
> +		bh_written = block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos,
> +					len, copied, &folio->page, NULL);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(bh_written != copied && bh_written != 0);
> +		ret = bh_written == copied;
> +	} else {
> +		ret = __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;

This could be cleaned up even further:

	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) {
		iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied);
		return true;
	}

	if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) {
		size_t bh_written;

		bh_written = block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos,
					len, copied, &folio->page, NULL);
		WARN_ON_ONCE(bh_written != copied && bh_written != 0);
		return bh_written == copied;
	}

	return __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio);

>  }
>  
>  static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
> @@ -907,7 +918,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
>  			flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>  
>  		copied = copy_folio_from_iter_atomic(folio, offset, bytes, i);
> -		written = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, copied, folio);
> +		written = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, copied, folio) ?
> +			  copied : 0;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Update the in-memory inode size after copying the data into
> @@ -1285,6 +1297,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_unshare_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter)
>  		int status;
>  		size_t offset;
>  		size_t bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, length);
> +		bool ret;
>  
>  		status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &folio);
>  		if (unlikely(status))
> @@ -1296,9 +1309,9 @@ static loff_t iomap_unshare_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter)
>  		if (bytes > folio_size(folio) - offset)
>  			bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset;
>  
> -		bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
> +		ret = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
>  		__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio);
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes == 0))
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))

If you named this variable "write_end_ok" then the diagnostic output
from the WARN_ONs would say that.  That said, it also encodes the line
number so it's not a big deal to leave this as it is.

With at least the first cleanup applied,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

>  			return -EIO;
>  
>  		cond_resched();
> @@ -1347,6 +1360,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
>  		int status;
>  		size_t offset;
>  		size_t bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, length);
> +		bool ret;
>  
>  		status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &folio);
>  		if (status)
> @@ -1361,9 +1375,9 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
>  		folio_zero_range(folio, offset, bytes);
>  		folio_mark_accessed(folio);
>  
> -		bytes = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
> +		ret = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
>  		__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio);
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes == 0))
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
>  			return -EIO;
>  
>  		pos += bytes;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-19 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-19  1:10 [PATCH v3 0/9] xfs/iomap: fix non-atomic clone operation and don't update size when zeroing range post eof Zhang Yi
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xfs: match lock mode in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin() Zhang Yi
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xfs: make the seq argument to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() optional Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xfs: make xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc() to allocate the target offset Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 20:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19 22:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-20  1:51     ` Zhang Yi
2024-03-20  1:57       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xfs: convert delayed extents to unwritten when zeroing post eof blocks Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] iomap: drop the write failure handles when unsharing and zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19  1:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] iomap: don't increase i_size if it's not a write operation Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] iomap: use a new variable to handle the written bytes in iomap_write_iter() Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] iomap: make iomap_write_end() return a boolean Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:08   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-19  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] iomap: do some small logical cleanup in buffered write Zhang Yi
2024-03-19 21:08   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240319210805.GM1927156@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox