From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:03:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327110318.2776850-4-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327110318.2776850-1-hch@lst.de>
Currently xfs_bmap_del_extent_real frees RT extents before updating
the bmap btree, while it frees regular blocks after performing the bmap
btree update. While this behavior goes back to the original commit,
I can't find any good reason for handling RT extent vs regular block
freeing differently. We use the same transaction, and unless rmaps
or reflink are enabled (which currently aren't support for RT inodes)
there are no transactions rolls or deferred ops that can rely on this
ordering.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 09d4b730ee9709..282b44deb9f864 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -5107,8 +5107,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
{
xfs_fsblock_t del_endblock=0; /* first block past del */
xfs_fileoff_t del_endoff; /* first offset past del */
- int do_fx; /* free extent at end of routine */
- int error; /* error return value */
+ int error = 0; /* error return value */
struct xfs_bmbt_irec got; /* current extent entry */
xfs_fileoff_t got_endoff; /* first offset past got */
int i; /* temp state */
@@ -5151,20 +5150,10 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
return -ENOSPC;
*logflagsp = XFS_ILOG_CORE;
- if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
- if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
- error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
- del->br_blockcount);
- if (error)
- return error;
- }
-
- do_fx = 0;
+ if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork))
qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_RTBCOUNT;
- } else {
- do_fx = 1;
+ else
qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_BCOUNT;
- }
nblks = del->br_blockcount;
del_endblock = del->br_startblock + del->br_blockcount;
@@ -5312,18 +5301,21 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
/*
* If we need to, add to list of extents to delete.
*/
- if (do_fx && !(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
+ if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) && whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
xfs_refcount_decrease_extent(tp, del);
+ } else if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
+ error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
+ del->br_blockcount);
} else {
error = xfs_free_extent_later(tp, del->br_startblock,
del->br_blockcount, NULL,
XFS_AG_RESV_NONE,
((bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD) ||
del->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN));
- if (error)
- return error;
}
+ if (error)
+ return error;
}
/*
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:08 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-03-27 14:55 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:42 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327110318.2776850-4-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox