public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:55:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327145540.GW6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327110318.2776850-4-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:03:08PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently xfs_bmap_del_extent_real frees RT extents before updating
> the bmap btree, while it frees regular blocks after performing the bmap
> btree update.  While this behavior goes back to the original commit,
> I can't find any good reason for handling RT extent vs regular block
> freeing differently.  We use the same transaction, and unless rmaps
> or reflink are enabled (which currently aren't support for RT inodes)
> there are no transactions rolls or deferred ops that can rely on this
> ordering.

...and the realtime rmap/reflink patchsets will want to reuse the data
device's ordering (bmap -> rmap -> refcount -> efi) for the rt volume.

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

I'm ok with moving this now since I'm mostly going to pave over it later
anyway :)

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 09d4b730ee9709..282b44deb9f864 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -5107,8 +5107,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
>  {
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		del_endblock=0;	/* first block past del */
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		del_endoff;	/* first offset past del */
> -	int			do_fx;	/* free extent at end of routine */
> -	int			error;	/* error return value */
> +	int			error = 0;	/* error return value */
>  	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	got;	/* current extent entry */
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		got_endoff;	/* first offset past got */
>  	int			i;	/* temp state */
> @@ -5151,20 +5150,10 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  
>  	*logflagsp = XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> -	if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
> -		if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
> -			error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
> -					del->br_blockcount);
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
> -		}
> -
> -		do_fx = 0;
> +	if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork))
>  		qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_RTBCOUNT;
> -	} else {
> -		do_fx = 1;
> +	else
>  		qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_BCOUNT;
> -	}
>  	nblks = del->br_blockcount;
>  
>  	del_endblock = del->br_startblock + del->br_blockcount;
> @@ -5312,18 +5301,21 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
>  	/*
>  	 * If we need to, add to list of extents to delete.
>  	 */
> -	if (do_fx && !(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
> +	if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
>  		if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) && whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
>  			xfs_refcount_decrease_extent(tp, del);
> +		} else if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
> +			error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
> +					del->br_blockcount);
>  		} else {
>  			error = xfs_free_extent_later(tp, del->br_startblock,
>  					del->br_blockcount, NULL,
>  					XFS_AG_RESV_NONE,
>  					((bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD) ||
>  					del->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN));
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
>  		}
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:08   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  3:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-27 17:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:13   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29  4:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:15   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:16   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:20   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:22   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:27   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:42       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  8:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25           ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:32   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28  4:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:35   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28  4:36   ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28  4:39   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240327145540.GW6390@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox