From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:55:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327145540.GW6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327110318.2776850-4-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:03:08PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently xfs_bmap_del_extent_real frees RT extents before updating
> the bmap btree, while it frees regular blocks after performing the bmap
> btree update. While this behavior goes back to the original commit,
> I can't find any good reason for handling RT extent vs regular block
> freeing differently. We use the same transaction, and unless rmaps
> or reflink are enabled (which currently aren't support for RT inodes)
> there are no transactions rolls or deferred ops that can rely on this
> ordering.
...and the realtime rmap/reflink patchsets will want to reuse the data
device's ordering (bmap -> rmap -> refcount -> efi) for the rt volume.
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
I'm ok with moving this now since I'm mostly going to pave over it later
anyway :)
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 09d4b730ee9709..282b44deb9f864 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -5107,8 +5107,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
> {
> xfs_fsblock_t del_endblock=0; /* first block past del */
> xfs_fileoff_t del_endoff; /* first offset past del */
> - int do_fx; /* free extent at end of routine */
> - int error; /* error return value */
> + int error = 0; /* error return value */
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec got; /* current extent entry */
> xfs_fileoff_t got_endoff; /* first offset past got */
> int i; /* temp state */
> @@ -5151,20 +5150,10 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> *logflagsp = XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> - if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
> - if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
> - error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
> - del->br_blockcount);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - }
> -
> - do_fx = 0;
> + if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork))
> qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_RTBCOUNT;
> - } else {
> - do_fx = 1;
> + else
> qfield = XFS_TRANS_DQ_BCOUNT;
> - }
> nblks = del->br_blockcount;
>
> del_endblock = del->br_startblock + del->br_blockcount;
> @@ -5312,18 +5301,21 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_real(
> /*
> * If we need to, add to list of extents to delete.
> */
> - if (do_fx && !(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
> + if (!(bflags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)) {
> if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) && whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
> xfs_refcount_decrease_extent(tp, del);
> + } else if (xfs_ifork_is_realtime(ip, whichfork)) {
> + error = xfs_rtfree_blocks(tp, del->br_startblock,
> + del->br_blockcount);
> } else {
> error = xfs_free_extent_later(tp, del->br_startblock,
> del->br_blockcount, NULL,
> XFS_AG_RESV_NONE,
> ((bflags & XFS_BMAPI_NODISCARD) ||
> del->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN));
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> }
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:08 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-27 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:42 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327145540.GW6390@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox