From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:14:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327151456.GZ6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327110318.2776850-12-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:03:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move the check if we have enough indirect blocks and the stealing of
> the deleted extent blocks out of xfs_bmap_split_indlen and into the
> caller to prepare for handling delayed allocation of RT extents that
> can't easily be stolen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks correct now,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 131d4f063b660a..9d0b7caa9a036c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4829,31 +4829,17 @@ xfs_bmapi_remap(
> * ores == 1). The number of stolen blocks is returned. The availability and
> * subsequent accounting of stolen blocks is the responsibility of the caller.
> */
> -static xfs_filblks_t
> +static void
> xfs_bmap_split_indlen(
> xfs_filblks_t ores, /* original res. */
> xfs_filblks_t *indlen1, /* ext1 worst indlen */
> - xfs_filblks_t *indlen2, /* ext2 worst indlen */
> - xfs_filblks_t avail) /* stealable blocks */
> + xfs_filblks_t *indlen2) /* ext2 worst indlen */
> {
> xfs_filblks_t len1 = *indlen1;
> xfs_filblks_t len2 = *indlen2;
> xfs_filblks_t nres = len1 + len2; /* new total res. */
> - xfs_filblks_t stolen = 0;
> xfs_filblks_t resfactor;
>
> - /*
> - * Steal as many blocks as we can to try and satisfy the worst case
> - * indlen for both new extents.
> - */
> - if (ores < nres && avail)
> - stolen = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(nres - ores, avail);
> - ores += stolen;
> -
> - /* nothing else to do if we've satisfied the new reservation */
> - if (ores >= nres)
> - return stolen;
> -
> /*
> * We can't meet the total required reservation for the two extents.
> * Calculate the percent of the overall shortage between both extents
> @@ -4898,8 +4884,6 @@ xfs_bmap_split_indlen(
>
> *indlen1 = len1;
> *indlen2 = len2;
> -
> - return stolen;
> }
>
> int
> @@ -4915,7 +4899,7 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec new;
> int64_t da_old, da_new, da_diff = 0;
> xfs_fileoff_t del_endoff, got_endoff;
> - xfs_filblks_t got_indlen, new_indlen, stolen;
> + xfs_filblks_t got_indlen, new_indlen, stolen = 0;
> uint32_t state = xfs_bmap_fork_to_state(whichfork);
> uint64_t fdblocks;
> int error = 0;
> @@ -4994,8 +4978,19 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
> new_indlen = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ip, new.br_blockcount);
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!got_indlen || !new_indlen);
> - stolen = xfs_bmap_split_indlen(da_old, &got_indlen, &new_indlen,
> - del->br_blockcount);
> + /*
> + * Steal as many blocks as we can to try and satisfy the worst
> + * case indlen for both new extents.
> + */
> + da_new = got_indlen + new_indlen;
> + if (da_new > da_old) {
> + stolen = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(da_new - da_old,
> + del->br_blockcount);
> + da_old += stolen;
> + }
> + if (da_new > da_old)
> + xfs_bmap_split_indlen(da_old, &got_indlen, &new_indlen);
> + da_new = got_indlen + new_indlen;
>
> got->br_startblock = nullstartblock((int)got_indlen);
>
> @@ -5007,7 +5002,6 @@ xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay(
> xfs_iext_next(ifp, icur);
> xfs_iext_insert(ip, icur, &new, state);
>
> - da_new = got_indlen + new_indlen - stolen;
> del->br_blockcount -= stolen;
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 11:03 bring back RT delalloc support v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:08 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: refactor realtime inode locking Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: free RT extents after updating the bmap btree Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-29 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-30 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-27 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:42 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-28 4:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:14 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-28 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-27 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-28 4:36 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-27 11:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 4:39 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-22 11:20 bring back RT delalloc support v6 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-22 11:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rework splitting of indirect block reservations Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327151456.GZ6390@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox