From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: do not allocate the entire delalloc extent in xfs_bmapi_write
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:16:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240409231601.GJ6390@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408145454.718047-9-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:54:54PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> While trying to convert the entire delalloc extent is a good decision
> for regular writeback as it leads to larger contigous on-disk extents,
> but for other callers of xfs_bmapi_write is is rather questionable as
> it forced them to loop creating new transactions just in case there
> is no large enough contiguous extent to cover the whole delalloc
> reservation.
>
> Change xfs_bmapi_write to only allocate the passed in range instead.
Looking at this... I guess xfs_map_blocks -> xfs_convert_blocks ->
xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc -> xfs_bmapi_allocate is now how writeback
converts delalloc extents before scheduling writeout. This is how the
mass-conversions of large da reservations got done before this series,
and that's still how it works, right?
Whereas xfs_bmapi_write is for targeted conversions only?
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
If yes and yes, then:
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 7700a48e013d5a..748809b13113ab 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4533,8 +4533,9 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
> bma.length = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(len, XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN);
>
> if (wasdelay) {
> - bma.offset = bma.got.br_startoff;
> - bma.length = bma.got.br_blockcount;
> + bma.length = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(bma.length,
> + bma.got.br_blockcount -
> + (bno - bma.got.br_startoff));
> } else {
> if (!eof)
> bma.length = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(bma.length,
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 14:54 RFC: extended version of the xfs_bmapi_write retval fix Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: fix error returns from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: remove the unusued tmp_logflags variable in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: lifr a xfs_valid_startblock into xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: don't open code XFS_FILBLKS_MIN in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: pass the actual offset and len to allocate to xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: remove the xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent call in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: fix xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real for partial conversions Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: do not allocate the entire delalloc extent in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-04-10 4:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240409231601.GJ6390@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox